Skip to main content

Who do they represent?


Alexandria area State Representative Mary Franson has been in the news this week regarding her refusal to meet with a group of well mannered Alexandria high schoolers. My brother John sent the letter below to the Long Prairie Leader. It makes you wonder how many other politicians believe they represent only part of their constituency. -- ed.

Dear Editor,

It's a good idea to keep an eye on the legislators in order to see what kind of mischief they are up to.  Even if they are not from your district. You may remember Mary Franson; she was our representative until a few years back when things were redistricted and she was sent across the county line to Douglas County to represent the folks over there.

So I have more or less kept my eye on Mary. She caught my attention this week with a Twitter exchange she had with the Student Democratic Society at Alexandria High School.  The students wanted to meet with her at her office out of a sense of civic responsibility and a lesson in representative democracy.  It's a troubling exchange and illustrates why the Republican majority in the Minnesota House needs to be reduced by at least one in the coming elections.

The kids started the exchange:  "We'd love to have a meeting with you soon to address our concerns, and have a respectful productive talk.  Thanks".

Franson's office initially didn't reply, but after another query from the students, responded: "I don't meet with partisan groups in my office - besides, isn't your group actively campaigning against me. One of your members is soliciting funds for my opponent."

The students replied:  "Just because we are of different parties doesn't mean we shouldn't meet and talk out our differences.  We actually think that's necessary, regardless of what campaign some of our members are on!  We are constituents who had some concerns."

Franson rebuffed the kids once again saying she doesn't meet with "partisan groups.   Thanks for playing!"

The students persisted with an even-handed and professional reply: "It's a legislator's duty to listen to their constituents.  We're not sure how you hear all perspectives without such meetings.  You represent us, too!  Not just the Republicans."

Franson shut them down for good with a final tweet: "It's not a Legislator's duty  to meet with a 'proudly'  partisan group."

Franson, becoming aware of the jaw-dropping meanness of her exchange with the students, attempted to delete it from the twittersphere.  But it didn't go away.  KMSP TV in the cities got wind of her toxic Twitter and called her up.  At a loss for a plausible explanation as to why she refused to meet with the students, Franson told the reporter she couldn't "risk" meeting with minors for fear of being accused of sexual impropriety.  This transparent howler, this "Hail Mary" of an excuse,  alone disqualifies her for office.  Any politician worthy of my vote should be able to lie better than that.


Rep. Franson has regularly acted in dumb ways that should, as my brother suggests, disqualify her from representing the people of Minnesota. Below is her infamous food stamp comment clipped from Wikipedia. -- ed.

In March 2012, Franson was featured in a YouTube video in which she shared a statement made by someone she referred to as "a friend":
"Isn't it ironic that the food stamp program, part of the Department of Agriculture, is pleased to be distributing the greatest amount of food stamps ever. Meanwhile, the Park Service, also part of the Department of Agriculture, asks us to please not feed the animals, because the animals may grow dependent and not learn to take care of themselves."

Comments

  1. From my brother Patrick.

    Here's the internet news link--from a highly credible blog-- that so accurately documented Crazy Mary's latest "crazy". She's a wannabe Michele Bachman, equally entertaining, but even more deeply deluded and not quite as cynically savvy a politician.

    Patrick

    http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/mary-franson-cant-risk-meeting-with-minors-roy-moore

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great letter, John. This is typical for Mary Franson. When we were moved out of her district, I got a Christmas card from a relative who worked at the Capital for one of the big newspapers in the Cities. He thanked me for leaving the reporters' entertainment at the Capitol. I didn't let him know she wasn't my problem any longer.

    ReplyDelete
  3. https://www.inforum.com/news/government-and-politics/4379148-franson-meets-student-democrats-issues-apology

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let us all walk in the foot steps of John Lewis

By John King In Selma, Alabama, on Sunday, March 7, 1965, John Lewis, standing in the lead of a long line of marchers, looked down from the crest of The Edmund Pettus Bridge at the line of police armed with clubs, whips and truncheons and said, “I am going to die here.” Lewis intended to lead the marchers from Selma to the capital Montgomery, to demand access to voting for Black people in Alabama. Sheriff Jim Clark lowered his gas mask and led the deputies, some on horseback and some on foot, into the line of marchers. Under swinging clubs and hooves trampling, Lewis was the first to go down. Women and children were not spared. Choking and blinded by tear gas, they were struck by clubs and truncheons wrapped with barbed wire. Lewis, with a fractured skull and a severe concussion, almost did die. The nearby Good Samaritan Hospital did not have enough beds to care for the injured marchers. A nation watched in horror as news footage of that bloody day appeared on T

More Republican dirty tricks

  As a Blue Dog Corporate Democrat, 7th District Rep. Collin Peterson’s votes in Congress go against the beliefs and convictions of progressive voters in our district. I’m one of those progressive 7th District voters. Like most average voters I rarely actually encounter my Member of Congress. However, I recall three encounters with Rep. Peterson over the many years I’ve been stuck with him. I met him at Mikey’s Restaurant, on Main Street in Long Prairie, when he was first campaigning for a seat in Congress. We were both young then and he was full of energy and inspired in me a sense of hope for positive change. Besides, I’d met the Republican incumbent. He was an older man who, it seemed, was operating on dead batteries. I was happy to vote for the energetic Peterson. Some years later I was a delegate to the DFL District convention in Bemidji. Peterson opposed a woman’s right to choose abortion. He was being challenged by a woman who supported the right to that choice. I gave my

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the