Skip to main content

Gazelka votes to insure the insurance companies instead of the people, " "

Below is a response to my article, "Kresha, Gazelka, Poston gift insurance companies" from my brother John. Following his  comments to me is a letter he sent to the Long Prairie Leader last April.  

Tim,

Here is a letter I wrote for the Leader last year during the session. You remember our really cool budget surplus?  Well about half of it went to bail out the insurance companies. That why HHS and a bunch of other stuff didn't get funded adequately and why when CHIP wasn't reauthorized this year (by Republicans), the state was facing a deficit because we had to fund the program ourselves. God!! I'm sick of Republicans!


Gazelka votes to insure the insurance companies instead of the people

Dear Editor:

This is a fair question to ask:  Who needs health insurance premium relief the most?  The insurance companies themselves or Minnesotans, you and I?  The question answers itself.  We have been inflicted by 20% premium increases with no end in sight. But our senator, Senator Gazelka, was stumped by the question and in a vote last week decided to hand over $600 million in state money to the insurance companies.  He is doing this because, “I think, maybe, this will lower our premiums.”  Unhuh.  When was the last time your insurance company decided to charge you less for anything?

To be honest, the Senator did have another reason for doing this.  He said,” Minnesota Care expansion would bankrupt health care in rural Minnesota.”  What did he mean by this and is it true?



Minnesota Care (MNCare) is the State-run health insurance for low income people that is 25 years old this year.  It currently has 100,000 Minnesotans enrolled in it. The program insures people through a combination reduced individual premiums and a pot of money replenished by a 2% tax on health care providers. The income cap for a family of three is currently $40,000.  That pot of money, the Health Care Access Fund, is flush right now because health care in Minnesota has been a brisk business lately.  It’s a good program that works and it doesn’t cost the State much money.  Best of all it provides low cost health insurance for people who otherwise wouldn’t be able to afford it.

Governor Dayton proposed raising the income cap for MNCare thus embracing more people and taking advantage of the guaranteed lower premiums that are a part of the program.  MNCare is able to offer lowered premiums in part because it reimburses the doctors and hospitals at lower rate just like Medical Assistance and Medicare.

So Senator Gazelka had a choice, pay the insurance companies a lot of money in hopes they will lower your premiums, or buy into an existing insurance program that is thriving and will guarantee you lower premiums. Will MNCare bankrupt health care?

Shortly there will be three new hospitals in the area; Staples, Long Prairie and Melrose.  They are building these new facilities with money from MNCare, Medical Assistance and Medicare.  These three programs make up almost three quarters (70%) of the insurance income for health care in Minnesota. Our rural hospitals have always, now and in the past, profited from the money from the three public insurance programs.  Senator Gazelka, expanded MNCare will not bankrupt health care in Minnesota.  Expanded health care coverage in Minnesota will insure that we have modern hospitals and the best care in the Midwest.

Paul Gazelka


I reminded the Senator of this last week and then he went and voted to give the money to the insurance companies.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Senator Gazelka: Prepare for End Times

Review by John King “Marketplace Ministers are part of how the Lord will reach the peoples of the earth in these last days.” Author Paul Gazelka wrote this astonishing sentence near the conclusion of his 2003 book, Marketplace Ministers , but it is a good place to start here because it so neatly encapsulates the message of the book which is that business people, by spreading the Gospel, are in a unique position to prepare us, for the end of the world.   Gazelka, an insurance salesman in Baxter, Minnesota, devotes chapters one through four to the story of his religious calling and how he came to adopt the “marketplace” as his personal ministry.  He goes to some length, relying in part on the “Fivefold Path” from Ephesians to convince the reader that the marketplace is a legitimate pulpit to spread the Word.  The remainder of the book, using personal anecdotes and biblical passages, he explains how a marketplace ministry would function and what its usefulness w...

Super-emitting frequent fliers responsible for 50% of aviation CO2

U.S. airlines received a $15 billion subsidy in December’s COVID relief package. The subsidy was for the companies to re-employ thousands of their furloughed employees and keep them on the payroll until at least the end of the first quarter of this year. Congress, and the President, attached no other strings to the huge subsidy, even though airlines social costs, in terms of climate disruption, are huge. In 2018 airlines produced a billion tons of CO2 and benefited from a $100 billion subsidy by not paying for the climate damage they caused, a report published in the November 2020 journal Global Environmental Change, pointed out. The report, summarized in The Guardian on November 17th, drew together data to provide a global picture of the impact of frequent fliers. The conclusion reached by the study’s authors, led by Stefan Gössling at Linnaeus University in Sweden, is that a tiny fraction of the global population benefits from the highly subsidized airline industry while the rest...

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the...