Skip to main content

Kresha, Gazelka, Poston gift insurance companies

State Representatives John Poston and Ron Kresha, along with Senator Paul Gazelka, voted last legislative session to give the gift of tax payer money to non-profit Health Maintenance Organizations licensed to sell medical insurance in Minnesota.

Edward Ehlinger, Minnesota’s Commissioner of Health, called the action reckless. Since the Republican bill was enacted in 2017, Medica, one of Minnesota’s medical insurance non-profits, has begun the process of transferring $90 million of taxpayer money out of Minnesota. 

Here’s how it happened, according to Tina Liebling, a seventh term Rochestor area State Representative and a leader amongst the DFL on medical insurance issues.

Tina Liebling - Thanks Wikipedia


“You remember there was a big issue last fall (2016) that insurance rates were very high for a lot of people who had to buy their own insurance on the individual market,” Liebling said.

Governor Dayton suggested giving those people a twenty-five percent State funded discount. He wanted to call a special legislative session, in the autumn of 2016, to enact the legislation to help vulnerable Minnesotans. The Republicans nixed the idea.

“So we came into session in January (2017) and now the Republicans decided to go ahead and do what the Governor had wanted earlier,” Liebling said.

Kresha, Poston and Gazelka, among other Republicans, knew Dayton wanted the twenty-five percent discount for those who couldn’t get help from Obama Care. They knew he’d sign that bill. So they made a trade.

“One of the things they buried in that bill was to allow for-profit insurance to be sold in Minnesota,” Liebling said. “For many years we did not allow for-profit insurance companies like United Health to sell insurance in Minnesota.”

“They also repealed a little section of the law that required our non-profit HMOs, like Medica or Blue Cross, to use their reserves - their extra assets - only for health care.”

Liebling says that most of those reserves come from State funded programs like Minnesota Care and Medicaid.

“When somebody goes on Medicaid, for example, the State contracts with these companies to provide insurance for that person,” she said. “The Minnesota Department of Health negotiates a premium rate. It’s a very complex process and many legislators over the years have become very distrustful of how that’s done. The HMOs play with the numbers and we overpay them.”

So the overpayments pile up and the companies say they are reserves and that they belong to them. Liebling doesn’t exactly disagree that they belong to the HMOs but under the old law the reserves could be used to hold premium costs down.

“Every time the State negotiates rates with them we try to get rates that the federal government calls actuarially sound,” Liebling said. “So how much they have in reserves plays into this idea that they must be sound. They have millions of dollars in reserves and it’s mostly the taxpayers’ money. It ought to go back to being used for health care for Minnesotans.”

Once the new law was enacted the HMOs acted swiftly. In March, Medica transferred $30 million to shore up a non-profit Wisconsin subsidiary. Then, in August 2017, Medica began transferring $60 million of its Minnesota reserves to a non-profit in Pennsylvania and that non-profit will in turn transfer the money to Medica Insurance Company which is a for-profit company, according to Liebling.

Liebling has asked the Department of Health to conduct some over sight into the draining of Minnesota’s HMO reserves into other states. Commissioner Ehlinger has responded by saying that the legislation was drafted rapidly and carelessly and that the Legislature gave him no guidance on the matter. His hands are tied, he says.

“I would welcome additional legislation by the Legislature in 2018 to remedy this situation and ensure that MDH has sufficient legal authority to protect the non-profit assets, paid by all premium-paying Minnesotans, into the bank accounts of our local HMOs,” he wrote in a letter to Liebling on November 17th.

Since MDH won’t act, Liebling has asked the Governor to act to halt the transfer of the $60 million to the for-profit insurance company, but she doesn’t sound hopeful.

“The Governor and the Department of Health are too meek,” she said. “They need to stand up and not give away our money. They need to fight for the people.”

“It’s eleven percent of Medica’s entire reserves and I don’t know how they managed to get themselves in this position. We don’t even know who sponsored that bill,” Liebling said. “But that money should stay in Minnesota and be used to reduce rates for Minnesotans.” 


Gazelka, Kresha, Poston and their legislative cronies don’t see it that way. They believe supporting insurance companies is more important then supporting Minnesotans.

Tina Liebling is seeking the DFL endorsement for Governor. Learn more here  https://www.tinaliebling.com 

This column originally appeared in the Long Prairie Learder.  http://lpleader.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Senator Gazelka: Prepare for End Times

Review by John King “Marketplace Ministers are part of how the Lord will reach the peoples of the earth in these last days.” Author Paul Gazelka wrote this astonishing sentence near the conclusion of his 2003 book, Marketplace Ministers , but it is a good place to start here because it so neatly encapsulates the message of the book which is that business people, by spreading the Gospel, are in a unique position to prepare us, for the end of the world.   Gazelka, an insurance salesman in Baxter, Minnesota, devotes chapters one through four to the story of his religious calling and how he came to adopt the “marketplace” as his personal ministry.  He goes to some length, relying in part on the “Fivefold Path” from Ephesians to convince the reader that the marketplace is a legitimate pulpit to spread the Word.  The remainder of the book, using personal anecdotes and biblical passages, he explains how a marketplace ministry would function and what its usefulness w...

Super-emitting frequent fliers responsible for 50% of aviation CO2

U.S. airlines received a $15 billion subsidy in December’s COVID relief package. The subsidy was for the companies to re-employ thousands of their furloughed employees and keep them on the payroll until at least the end of the first quarter of this year. Congress, and the President, attached no other strings to the huge subsidy, even though airlines social costs, in terms of climate disruption, are huge. In 2018 airlines produced a billion tons of CO2 and benefited from a $100 billion subsidy by not paying for the climate damage they caused, a report published in the November 2020 journal Global Environmental Change, pointed out. The report, summarized in The Guardian on November 17th, drew together data to provide a global picture of the impact of frequent fliers. The conclusion reached by the study’s authors, led by Stefan Gössling at Linnaeus University in Sweden, is that a tiny fraction of the global population benefits from the highly subsidized airline industry while the rest...

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the...