Skip to main content

Mocking religious extremism in politics

Michele Bachman, Mary Franson, and Paul Gazelka are intolerant anti-democratic religious extremists. Having said that I am wondering if mocking their religious views is the moral and upright thing to do.

Bachman recently took wide spread heat for telling a television commentator that she was going to ask God if she should become a candidate for governor in Minnesota. When she said that, knees set on auto-jerk went into rapid action. Ridicule was heaped on the former Member of Congress and Presidential aspirant.
Bill board in St. Paul erected last weekend
Thanks Twitter

 But was ridiculing Bachman's comment that she was going to pray before reaching a decision becoming of those who would criticize Bachman for her intolerant and authoritarian views? Aren't we bigger than that. Can't we take on Bachman, and other zealots like her, without ridiculing their fundamental religious beliefs? I refuse to laugh at another persons religious beliefs.

My brother-in-law and I were talking about our religious upbringing the other day. It was pretty conservative for both of us. We both came from households where praying for religious guidance in our lives was fairly common place. But prayer was a private matter between the person praying and their god.

"That stuff stays at home or in church," he said. "You don't take that stuff to St. Paul," he said referring to State Senator Paul Gazelka.

That's it!

Bachman has a right to pray for guidance from her deity. But once she announces it on television she's turned er relationship with that deity into politics. She politicized her god. Having put God into play in the field of politics she opened herself up to criticism, even by ridicule.

Religion should not be a political matter in the United States of America. We are a secular nation that accepts all creeds as long as they do not infringe upon the rights of others. Bachman, Franson, and Gazelka use their religion to abridge the freedom of others. Thats politics and they must be stopped; even if we must use ridicule.

We can ridicule a political stance even if it is grounded in a religious belief.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Senator Gazelka: Prepare for End Times

Review by John King “Marketplace Ministers are part of how the Lord will reach the peoples of the earth in these last days.” Author Paul Gazelka wrote this astonishing sentence near the conclusion of his 2003 book, Marketplace Ministers , but it is a good place to start here because it so neatly encapsulates the message of the book which is that business people, by spreading the Gospel, are in a unique position to prepare us, for the end of the world.   Gazelka, an insurance salesman in Baxter, Minnesota, devotes chapters one through four to the story of his religious calling and how he came to adopt the “marketplace” as his personal ministry.  He goes to some length, relying in part on the “Fivefold Path” from Ephesians to convince the reader that the marketplace is a legitimate pulpit to spread the Word.  The remainder of the book, using personal anecdotes and biblical passages, he explains how a marketplace ministry would function and what its usefulness w...

Super-emitting frequent fliers responsible for 50% of aviation CO2

U.S. airlines received a $15 billion subsidy in December’s COVID relief package. The subsidy was for the companies to re-employ thousands of their furloughed employees and keep them on the payroll until at least the end of the first quarter of this year. Congress, and the President, attached no other strings to the huge subsidy, even though airlines social costs, in terms of climate disruption, are huge. In 2018 airlines produced a billion tons of CO2 and benefited from a $100 billion subsidy by not paying for the climate damage they caused, a report published in the November 2020 journal Global Environmental Change, pointed out. The report, summarized in The Guardian on November 17th, drew together data to provide a global picture of the impact of frequent fliers. The conclusion reached by the study’s authors, led by Stefan Gössling at Linnaeus University in Sweden, is that a tiny fraction of the global population benefits from the highly subsidized airline industry while the rest...

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the...