Skip to main content

Free cash for Xcel Energy

They’re at it again! A bunch of Republicans in the Minnesota Legislature want to give Xcel Energy a bag of free cash.

There’s nothing that some Minnesota Legislators like more than to transfer wealth from ordinary working and retired people to Minnesota’s wealthiest and largest corporations. Back in the days of Ronald “The Gipper” Reagan they created a smoke screen by calling it trickle down economics. The idea was that we’d give a lot of tax money to rich people and they’d use most of it to get richer and some of it to us in the form of jobs.

Now we don’t believe that anymore. We don’t believe that anymore because, since the Gipper was President, CEO pay in big corporations has gone up by more than 800%. That means if a CEO was earning $200,000 in 1981 he’s now earning $1,600,000. While taxpayers’ dollars were gushing up to CEOs and corporate big wigs, some did dribble back down. While CEO pay went up 800% plus some, the average working Jane and Joe had an 11.2% increase in wages. So, if you were earning $23,000 in 1981, Reagan’s first year in office, you are now earning around $26,000.

Sounds like you and I got trickled on, all right.

Ben Fowkes, CEO of Xcel Energy, earned $8,881,703.00 last year. That’s just shy of nine million a year. A customer service representative for Ben’s electric utility earned just shy of $12.00 an hour.

Most Republicans oppose paying that customer service rep a minimum wage of $15.00 per hour. Bad for business, they mumble. 

But they do support a piece of legislation that will surely give Old Ben a pay bump.

Here’s the deal regarding a bill called SF 3504, or a carbon reduction facility designation for certain nuclear energy electric generating facilities.

Prairie Island generating plant
Thanks to Wikipedia
Xcel owns a nuclear power plant on Prairie Island in the Mississippi near Red Wing. They own another one upriver near Monticello. Normally they have to get approval from the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to do repair projects on these plants. That’s because Xcel, or any other utility with a monopoly, can charge their customers for the repairs plus a reasonable profit. Xcel gets to make a reasonable profit on repairs if the repairs are managed well.

The last time Xcel did a big repair job on their nukes the project had a $400 million overrun. The PUC told Xcel that they couldn’t charge their customers and make a profit on the overruns. The agency called the overrun imprudent management.

Now you can imagine nine-million-dollar Ben was stung by the claim that he had imprudently managed the company he was supposed to be running. He wanted a profit and a fat bonus for his repair job overrun. So, he called in the fattest cats in the lobbying business and they made a plan.

Xcel currently is planning a $1.4 billion repair project at their two nuclear power plants. And Big Bucks Ben and the Fat Cats have put their plan into action. It’s their fake carbon reduction facility designation legislation. 

This bill will allow Xcel to go arount the PUC and charge their customers for whatever size of overrun that the repair project has.  If you can make a profit on overruns, don’t you think you’d be tempted to go over the project budget? I mean, just a teensy bit? Like a few hundred million? Nobody will even notice now that you don’t have to talk to those nasty PUC regulators.

My personal opinion is that the rich shouldn’t get richer by charging us more for electricity. But I understand that Senator Gazelka believes that CEO Ben Fowkes is rich because he’s been blessed by God. I understand that Sen. Gazelka believes his ministry is to shower more riches on the blessed rich. If you don’t believe me read his book Market Place Ministers. So, I wasn’t surprised when he didn’t respond to my inquiry about SF 3504.

But I was disappointed in Representative Kresha’s silence. Here’s what I wrote to him:

“Dear Ron.

Last year I suggested to you that the Republicans had an agenda to weaken the Public Utilities Commission. You politely disagreed with me.

I’m afraid they are back at it again with HF 3708. We want you to know that we strongly opposed to HF 3708/ SF3504. We do not believe that Minnesotans should be allowing Xcel to determine the amount of taxpayer money that they receive, particularly because they are attempting to bypass the Public Utilities Commission. We do not want money flowing unchecked into the hands of a company that has had a history of cost overruns and “imprudent management” according to the Public Utilities Commission, the Department of Commerce, and the Attorney General. We know your job as Whip is to move these bills along. But please - do not support this bill.”

I didn’t hear back so I wrote Rep. Poston a similar note and I heard back. Here’s what he said.

“Good Morning Tim. Thank you for your note! I will review the bill today! Have a Great week!!!”


Boy, I sure hope we can count on Rep. Poston to protect us from more trickle down from Big Bucks Ben and his friends.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Let us all walk in the foot steps of John Lewis

By John King In Selma, Alabama, on Sunday, March 7, 1965, John Lewis, standing in the lead of a long line of marchers, looked down from the crest of The Edmund Pettus Bridge at the line of police armed with clubs, whips and truncheons and said, “I am going to die here.” Lewis intended to lead the marchers from Selma to the capital Montgomery, to demand access to voting for Black people in Alabama. Sheriff Jim Clark lowered his gas mask and led the deputies, some on horseback and some on foot, into the line of marchers. Under swinging clubs and hooves trampling, Lewis was the first to go down. Women and children were not spared. Choking and blinded by tear gas, they were struck by clubs and truncheons wrapped with barbed wire. Lewis, with a fractured skull and a severe concussion, almost did die. The nearby Good Samaritan Hospital did not have enough beds to care for the injured marchers. A nation watched in horror as news footage of that bloody day appeared on T

More Republican dirty tricks

  As a Blue Dog Corporate Democrat, 7th District Rep. Collin Peterson’s votes in Congress go against the beliefs and convictions of progressive voters in our district. I’m one of those progressive 7th District voters. Like most average voters I rarely actually encounter my Member of Congress. However, I recall three encounters with Rep. Peterson over the many years I’ve been stuck with him. I met him at Mikey’s Restaurant, on Main Street in Long Prairie, when he was first campaigning for a seat in Congress. We were both young then and he was full of energy and inspired in me a sense of hope for positive change. Besides, I’d met the Republican incumbent. He was an older man who, it seemed, was operating on dead batteries. I was happy to vote for the energetic Peterson. Some years later I was a delegate to the DFL District convention in Bemidji. Peterson opposed a woman’s right to choose abortion. He was being challenged by a woman who supported the right to that choice. I gave my

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the