Skip to main content

Stop Guilt by Association Bill; Call/email now


Hello Climate Champions!
The legislature is currently considering a particularly nasty bill that would criminalize organizing and activism in a way that we find deeply troubling, so we're asking you to contact your legislators about it.
What is it?
HF3693 / SF 3463 is being called the “guilty by association” bill. It creates harsher criminal charges on people who trespass on critical infrastructure. It also imposes liability on those who are seen as having helped the person who has trespassed by educating, recruiting, hiring, etc. that individual. This bill ups the trespassing charge from a misdemeanor to a felony. This bill has recently passed through committees in the House and Senate, and is ready to go for a floor vote when the Representatives and Senators return from spring recess this week.
What does that mean?
  • Critical infrastructure is infrastructure that is seen as vitally important to the functioning of daily life such as power, water, fuel, etc.
  • An argument against the bill is that it is very vague, so it is hard to know what it really means! Could it (if enacted) be interpreted that providing a meeting space to those who eventually commit an act of felony trespass makes the provider of the meeting place also liable? The language could be interpreted in a variety of troubling ways. The freedom to assemble is a constitutional right.


Why are we worried?
There are laws already on the books that protect critical infrastructure from trespassing and conspiracy to commit trespass. This bill discourages Minnesotans from exercising their right to free speech and association. It seems to be in reaction to the protests that we have seen in the past years like the pipeline protests. John Gordon, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union - Minnesota, testified at both the House and Senate hearings, and said the bills were “unnecessary, unwise, and unconstitutional.”  It is critical to the functioning of a healthy democracy that this bill does not pass.
What can we do?
Call and write your legislators and the governor. (Scripts are attached!) Tell your friends and family to do the same.
When the bill comes up for a vote, we will be sending you an alert to give one final push to make sure that this bill does not pass! Be on the look out for this follow up action sometime next week. We will have about 24 hours notice on when the bill goes to a vote!

 Contacts for Senate District 9;
Rep. John Poston Rep.John.Poston@house.mn or 651-296-4293

Sen. Paul Gazelka 651-296-4875 or  Sen.Paul.Gazelka@senate.mn
Script
Hello _____. I am calling to strongly urge you to vote against HF3693 / SF3463. The protection of critical infrastructure is very important to the functioning of daily life, but there are already existing laws that protect critical infrastructure from trespass, making this bill unnecessary. Beyond that, the language of this bill is so vague that I fear that it will interfere with the ability of Minnesotans to participate our democracy through peaceful and legal means. The Director of the ACLU says these bills are “unnecessary, unwise, and unconstitutional.”  Vote no on HF3693 / SF3463!

If you are calling Governor Dayton, urge him to veto this bill, if  it comes to his desk.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Senator Gazelka: Prepare for End Times

Review by John King “Marketplace Ministers are part of how the Lord will reach the peoples of the earth in these last days.” Author Paul Gazelka wrote this astonishing sentence near the conclusion of his 2003 book, Marketplace Ministers , but it is a good place to start here because it so neatly encapsulates the message of the book which is that business people, by spreading the Gospel, are in a unique position to prepare us, for the end of the world.   Gazelka, an insurance salesman in Baxter, Minnesota, devotes chapters one through four to the story of his religious calling and how he came to adopt the “marketplace” as his personal ministry.  He goes to some length, relying in part on the “Fivefold Path” from Ephesians to convince the reader that the marketplace is a legitimate pulpit to spread the Word.  The remainder of the book, using personal anecdotes and biblical passages, he explains how a marketplace ministry would function and what its usefulness w...
3 comments
Read more

Super-emitting frequent fliers responsible for 50% of aviation CO2

U.S. airlines received a $15 billion subsidy in December’s COVID relief package. The subsidy was for the companies to re-employ thousands of their furloughed employees and keep them on the payroll until at least the end of the first quarter of this year. Congress, and the President, attached no other strings to the huge subsidy, even though airlines social costs, in terms of climate disruption, are huge. In 2018 airlines produced a billion tons of CO2 and benefited from a $100 billion subsidy by not paying for the climate damage they caused, a report published in the November 2020 journal Global Environmental Change, pointed out. The report, summarized in The Guardian on November 17th, drew together data to provide a global picture of the impact of frequent fliers. The conclusion reached by the study’s authors, led by Stefan Gössling at Linnaeus University in Sweden, is that a tiny fraction of the global population benefits from the highly subsidized airline industry while the rest...
4 comments
Read more

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the...
2 comments
Read more