Skip to main content

Collin Peterson votes for more nukes

Thursday night Rep. Collin Peterson voted with Republicans to give Donald Trump $65 million more for nuclear bombs. Although most Democrats voted for an ammendment by California Representative Barbara Lee to not fund the new nuclear weapons program, Peterson voted against the Lee amendment.

The Lee ammendment was an attempt to stop the United State from building an arsenal of so called “usable” nuclear bombs which are often called mini-nukes. These so-called mini-nukes are a number of times more powerful than the bomb the U.S. dropped on Hiroshima Japan on August 6, 1945. That bomb, which was not only small but considered inefficient, killed between 70,000 and 80,000 people immediately. It wounded another 70,000, many of whom were terribly burned and died later.

Hiroshima Japan after a "small" and "usable" nuclear bomb
was dropped on the city in 1945
Thanks to Wikipedia
The bombs Congressman Peterson and his Republican colleagues voted for are not only larger but more “efficient” than the Hiroshima bomb. That is to say they will kill far more people. 

They are not small. They not mini. They are not “usable”. They are an atrocity and an affront to civilization.

Starting a bomb building program at a time when the United States claims to be seeking to eliminate nuclear bombs from Korea and Iran is the height of hypocrisy. How can we, the only country to ever use a nuclear bomb, expect them to disaem?

"Spending $65 million on a low-yield nuclear weapon – with unprecedented submarine-launch capability – heightens the risk of nuclear war," Barbara Lee said after her mmendment failed. "We should be de-escalating tensions with our allies, not provoking a new nuclear arms race.”

Lee wanted the money for the bomb program to be spent on halting the spread of nuclear weapons around the world.

"Given the instability in the world and in this White House, provoking nuclear brinksmanship is beyond reckless. Congress should be building peace and diplomacy, not inviting a miscalculation with nuclear consequences,” Lee told the on-line news source Common Dreams.

70,000 people were injured when the small nuclear
bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. Many were burned
and died later from complications or radiation sickness.
Photo from Wikipedia
Please call Collin Peterson at 202-225-2165 and tell him you are horrified at his reckless vote.


You can read more about this at (via tiny url) Common Dreams https://tinyurl.com/y8pzvkjq

Comments

  1. Peterson thinks he has a get out of primary free card by pandering to his big corporate donors and the ignorance of his district. So far it is hard to argue with his success at representing the corporations who are not centered in our district; but the winds may change on his quisling like nature or his arm gets tired from holding his finger in the air to check the direction of that wind. He is such a tool.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let us all walk in the foot steps of John Lewis

By John King In Selma, Alabama, on Sunday, March 7, 1965, John Lewis, standing in the lead of a long line of marchers, looked down from the crest of The Edmund Pettus Bridge at the line of police armed with clubs, whips and truncheons and said, “I am going to die here.” Lewis intended to lead the marchers from Selma to the capital Montgomery, to demand access to voting for Black people in Alabama. Sheriff Jim Clark lowered his gas mask and led the deputies, some on horseback and some on foot, into the line of marchers. Under swinging clubs and hooves trampling, Lewis was the first to go down. Women and children were not spared. Choking and blinded by tear gas, they were struck by clubs and truncheons wrapped with barbed wire. Lewis, with a fractured skull and a severe concussion, almost did die. The nearby Good Samaritan Hospital did not have enough beds to care for the injured marchers. A nation watched in horror as news footage of that bloody day appeared on T

More Republican dirty tricks

  As a Blue Dog Corporate Democrat, 7th District Rep. Collin Peterson’s votes in Congress go against the beliefs and convictions of progressive voters in our district. I’m one of those progressive 7th District voters. Like most average voters I rarely actually encounter my Member of Congress. However, I recall three encounters with Rep. Peterson over the many years I’ve been stuck with him. I met him at Mikey’s Restaurant, on Main Street in Long Prairie, when he was first campaigning for a seat in Congress. We were both young then and he was full of energy and inspired in me a sense of hope for positive change. Besides, I’d met the Republican incumbent. He was an older man who, it seemed, was operating on dead batteries. I was happy to vote for the energetic Peterson. Some years later I was a delegate to the DFL District convention in Bemidji. Peterson opposed a woman’s right to choose abortion. He was being challenged by a woman who supported the right to that choice. I gave my

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the