Skip to main content

Representative John Poston: Anti Environment or Anti Regulation?

I get emails from the environmental organization Conservation Minnesota that point out the dismal voting record that Sen. Paul Gazelka and Representative John Poston have on environmental issues.

 Sometimes I drop the two men a note pointing out their wrong-headed votes. Even though I almost never agree with John Poston I do appreciate his willingness to respond to me.

 A Conservation Minnesota email in June read as follows:

 "Did you know that lead is toxic to wildlife and is unsafe at every level in humans? A recent survey of Minnesotans showed that 76 percent supported phasing out the use of lead in ammunition to protect wildlife and people. Yet, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) estimates that 178 tons of lead were deposited on state lands during the 2017 small game hunting season.

In 2016, the Minnesota Legislature enacted a law forbidding the DNR from taking action to reduce lead ammunition until July 2019. During the 2018 legislative session, an amendment was offered in the House of Representatives to repeal the statute and allow the DNR to address the problem. The amendment did not pass.


Your state representative John Poston voted to prohibit the DNR from taking action to reduce the use of lead ammunition on state lands."

I emailed Rep. Poston and told him I was disappointed with his vote:

"Dear Representative Poston,

I was disappointed to hear that this session you voted against an amendment that would have allowed the DNR to take action to reduce the use of lead ammunition on state lands, especially because there are numerous non-toxic ammunition alternatives for hunters that are just as effective and similarly priced."
-----

Poston responded:

"Hi Tim

The vote was against giving the DNR rulemaking authority! Not about lead shot specifically! I will always vote for good environmental policies / bills!!!

Have a great Friday / Weekend!!!

John"
-----

I wrote back:

Thanks John.

Why not give the DNR rule making authority? Don’t we want to get the lead out, so to speak? What do you propose we do about it?

Tim
----

. . . and Poston responded:

"Good Morning Tim

I am sorry that I have not gotten back to you sooner! Rule making at the DNR and other state agencies looks an awful lot like law making, which is the job of the legislative branch of government. The legislature must go through the full legislative process to put something in to law, witch means involving all the stake holders! The agencies do not follow the same process! I did vote for an amendment to ban lead shot while hunting water fowl on state land, the bill ultimately did not pass because it included all ammunition. Some ammunition for certain types of hunting is not yet available lead free.

Have a Great Monday / Week!!!"
---

. . . and I wrote back:


"John.

Thanks for your thoughtful  response.

I think what you’re articulating is a basic Republican principle. I respect that and sort of agree with it. It would be interesting to discuss it more. Of course agencies have always made rules but the question is what are the limits to that. I have disagreed with the Republican efforts to weaken PUC rule making but sometimes I think the DNR is too powerful.

Regards,

Tim'

. . . and that was the end of the conversation.

The thing is, I don't believe that John Poston will ever support good environmental policies. John, and Republicans in general, us the anti-regulation principle of the party, as a smoke screen to either dismantle existing environmental laws or to refuse to pass new laws to protect the environment.

A week after I got the lead shot email from Conservation Minnesota I received an email from them saying that Rep. Poston voted against allowing the DNR to regulate bee-killing insecticides on DNR Wildlife Management Areas.

I've emailed Poston about this and I'm waiting for his response. I expect he'll say that he's  in principle opposed to the DNR regulating insecticides on DNR  land. But his principled inaction is killing  bees, wild pollinators, and wild life that ingests lead shot.



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let us all walk in the foot steps of John Lewis

By John King In Selma, Alabama, on Sunday, March 7, 1965, John Lewis, standing in the lead of a long line of marchers, looked down from the crest of The Edmund Pettus Bridge at the line of police armed with clubs, whips and truncheons and said, “I am going to die here.” Lewis intended to lead the marchers from Selma to the capital Montgomery, to demand access to voting for Black people in Alabama. Sheriff Jim Clark lowered his gas mask and led the deputies, some on horseback and some on foot, into the line of marchers. Under swinging clubs and hooves trampling, Lewis was the first to go down. Women and children were not spared. Choking and blinded by tear gas, they were struck by clubs and truncheons wrapped with barbed wire. Lewis, with a fractured skull and a severe concussion, almost did die. The nearby Good Samaritan Hospital did not have enough beds to care for the injured marchers. A nation watched in horror as news footage of that bloody day appeared on T
2 comments
Read more

More Republican dirty tricks

  As a Blue Dog Corporate Democrat, 7th District Rep. Collin Peterson’s votes in Congress go against the beliefs and convictions of progressive voters in our district. I’m one of those progressive 7th District voters. Like most average voters I rarely actually encounter my Member of Congress. However, I recall three encounters with Rep. Peterson over the many years I’ve been stuck with him. I met him at Mikey’s Restaurant, on Main Street in Long Prairie, when he was first campaigning for a seat in Congress. We were both young then and he was full of energy and inspired in me a sense of hope for positive change. Besides, I’d met the Republican incumbent. He was an older man who, it seemed, was operating on dead batteries. I was happy to vote for the energetic Peterson. Some years later I was a delegate to the DFL District convention in Bemidji. Peterson opposed a woman’s right to choose abortion. He was being challenged by a woman who supported the right to that choice. I gave my
Post a Comment
Read more

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the
2 comments
Read more