Skip to main content

Are political conventions a waste of time and money?

I spent a lot of time deciding who to vote for in the recent primary election. I finally settled on the candidates that had been endorsed by the DFL. I made that decision in part because they had the endorsement of a lot of thoughtful and dedicated people. But the endorsed candidates lost.

I'll support and vote for the DFL candidates in the general election. But I'm wondering what was the point of the expensive and time consuming process that led to the endorsements at the state convention.

Rep. Mary Ellen Otremba always told me that if I wanted to influence the political process I should get involved with the DFL through the endorsement process. I believed that and I've always attended precinct caucuses. I've often attended county and Senate district conventions. And I was a delegate to the Congressional District convention some years ago.

I also generally make a small donation to the DFL so it can conduct the county convention.

But what for? What is it for if the primary system is simply going to ignore all that time and expense of the conventions and endorsement process? We'd all be better off with a shorter election season; wouldn't we.

I'm not alone in this sentiment. The letter below appeared in the Long Prairie Leader just before the primary election. I share Patricia Seifert's sentiments although I'm happy to report that that the primary showed that it's not always money that determines the winner of an election.

I know there's a general election to focus on but please take a minute to read Patricia's letter. Then answer this question: Should the DFL  dump the convention system for 2020?

Tim

To the Editor:

Regardless of which of the two dominant political parties that you support or align with in Minnesota, your endorsement process is being spit upon by a large number of candidates this year.

Yes, all the time and expense of the endorsement process  means nothing to the candidates who have forced the primaries on us. They don’t think that the people who took the time to become delegates and/or alternates to the various conventions have any idea who would be a great candidate. Most delegates and alternates investigate and question candidates before the various conventions. Maybe some or most of those candidates did not want to answer the questions of the delegates and alternates.

The primary will always favor the candidate who has the most money. Why? Because the more money the more they can pay for advertising on tv, Facebook, Google, Twitter, Messenger, print, ect. And, unfortunately there are many voters who vote for the name they remember, so the more times a candidates name is seen or heard the more likely to get a vote.

There are candidates who rely on having the most money and better name recognition than the endorsed candidate. Most people don’t remember from one year to the next why a particular name sticks in their head when they step into the voting booth. 

Support the endorsement process by supporting the endorsed candidates.

Patricia Seifert
Grey Eagle

Frustrated Delegate

Comments

  1. Tim KingAugust 28, 2018 at 3:59 PM

    Marcia sent me this by email
    ;

    Interesting article. Maybe you’re right about not having a convention because of spending all that $$$$. I didn’t feel the same way Patrica did in her letter in the LP paper. She had a flavor of a poor loser to me. I think it’s ok to disagree with the candidate that your party endorses. Isn’t that the American way? Really isn’t that one more step in the checks and balances of our election system?
    Thanks for the article!
    Marcia

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Senator Gazelka: Prepare for End Times

Review by John King “Marketplace Ministers are part of how the Lord will reach the peoples of the earth in these last days.” Author Paul Gazelka wrote this astonishing sentence near the conclusion of his 2003 book, Marketplace Ministers , but it is a good place to start here because it so neatly encapsulates the message of the book which is that business people, by spreading the Gospel, are in a unique position to prepare us, for the end of the world.   Gazelka, an insurance salesman in Baxter, Minnesota, devotes chapters one through four to the story of his religious calling and how he came to adopt the “marketplace” as his personal ministry.  He goes to some length, relying in part on the “Fivefold Path” from Ephesians to convince the reader that the marketplace is a legitimate pulpit to spread the Word.  The remainder of the book, using personal anecdotes and biblical passages, he explains how a marketplace ministry would function and what its usefulness w...
3 comments
Read more

Super-emitting frequent fliers responsible for 50% of aviation CO2

U.S. airlines received a $15 billion subsidy in December’s COVID relief package. The subsidy was for the companies to re-employ thousands of their furloughed employees and keep them on the payroll until at least the end of the first quarter of this year. Congress, and the President, attached no other strings to the huge subsidy, even though airlines social costs, in terms of climate disruption, are huge. In 2018 airlines produced a billion tons of CO2 and benefited from a $100 billion subsidy by not paying for the climate damage they caused, a report published in the November 2020 journal Global Environmental Change, pointed out. The report, summarized in The Guardian on November 17th, drew together data to provide a global picture of the impact of frequent fliers. The conclusion reached by the study’s authors, led by Stefan Gössling at Linnaeus University in Sweden, is that a tiny fraction of the global population benefits from the highly subsidized airline industry while the rest...
4 comments
Read more

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the...
2 comments
Read more