Skip to main content

Rep. Kresha's leadership endangers constituents

Little Falls and Long Prairie State Representative Ronald Kresha holds a powerful position in the Minnesota Republican party. Rep. Kresha is the GOP’s Whip. Since the GOP was in the majority in the last legislative session Kresha was the Majority Whip in the House of Representatives.

Here’s what Wikipedia says about the Legislative Whip. 

“A whip is an official of a political party whose task is to ensure party discipline in a legislature. Whips are the party's "enforcers"; they invite their fellow legislators to attend voting sessions and to vote according to the official party policy. The term is taken from the "whipper-in" during a hunt, who tries to prevent the hounds from wandering away from the pack. Additionally, the term "whip" may mean the voting instructions issued to members by the whip.”

Since Ronald Kresha’s job is to keep the hounds from wandering away from the GOP pack he has to be a Party-line man. That is to say he has to vote the party line. As whip, he has to set an example for the hounds to follow. The party and its agenda comes first.

Rep. Kresha told me some years ago that he wanted to listen to all his constituents. At the time, he was speaking of new immigrant constituents in particular. I believed him then. But I’m wondering now if his leadership position as Majority Whip puts his constituents in the back seat.

Since I care about the environment I took a look at Ronald Kresha’s voting record on those subjects. It appears his votes are pretty much pure party line.

On May 14th he voted to restrict the DNR from making rules to reduce the use of lead ammunition on DNR lands. The DNR argues that lead is used extensively on DNR lands and that its use harms both wild life and humans The Republican Party says the DNR has no right to make rules to protect humans and wild life.

Using the same principle Kresha voted, on May 3rd, to not allow the DNR to restrict the use of neonictonide insecticides on DNR land. Although the pesticides harm honey bees and wild pollinators Kresha voted against letting the DNR to make a rule to protect pollinators. Then he got the Party Hounds to line up behind him and they voted no as well.

On April 23rd Kresha voted Yes, and got his Republican colleagues to vote yes, on restricting the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to establish wild rice sulfate water quality standards. Once again, the Republicans under Ronald Kresha voted that a state agency (the MPCA) does not have the authority to take action to protect the environment and their constituents. Fortunately, Governor Dayton vetoed this bill.

The list of attacks on the environment by the GOP, under Ronald Kresha’s leadership, is lengthy. Kresha consistently abides by the GOP principle that government agencies, using scientifically obtained facts, have no right to establish rules to protect citizens. That ill-conceived principle endangers his constituents. 

Government should serve the people and not some extremist Party agenda.

You can check on various Minnesota legislators conservation voting records here: http://www.checkmylegislator.org

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Senator Gazelka: Prepare for End Times

Review by John King “Marketplace Ministers are part of how the Lord will reach the peoples of the earth in these last days.” Author Paul Gazelka wrote this astonishing sentence near the conclusion of his 2003 book, Marketplace Ministers , but it is a good place to start here because it so neatly encapsulates the message of the book which is that business people, by spreading the Gospel, are in a unique position to prepare us, for the end of the world.   Gazelka, an insurance salesman in Baxter, Minnesota, devotes chapters one through four to the story of his religious calling and how he came to adopt the “marketplace” as his personal ministry.  He goes to some length, relying in part on the “Fivefold Path” from Ephesians to convince the reader that the marketplace is a legitimate pulpit to spread the Word.  The remainder of the book, using personal anecdotes and biblical passages, he explains how a marketplace ministry would function and what its usefulness w...

Super-emitting frequent fliers responsible for 50% of aviation CO2

U.S. airlines received a $15 billion subsidy in December’s COVID relief package. The subsidy was for the companies to re-employ thousands of their furloughed employees and keep them on the payroll until at least the end of the first quarter of this year. Congress, and the President, attached no other strings to the huge subsidy, even though airlines social costs, in terms of climate disruption, are huge. In 2018 airlines produced a billion tons of CO2 and benefited from a $100 billion subsidy by not paying for the climate damage they caused, a report published in the November 2020 journal Global Environmental Change, pointed out. The report, summarized in The Guardian on November 17th, drew together data to provide a global picture of the impact of frequent fliers. The conclusion reached by the study’s authors, led by Stefan Gössling at Linnaeus University in Sweden, is that a tiny fraction of the global population benefits from the highly subsidized airline industry while the rest...

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the...