Skip to main content

The psychotic immigration policies of Minnesota Republicans



I've been working on a project this last week that has required me to look at the web sites and read the comments of Minnesota's candidates for governor, Senator, and Members of the U.S. Congress.

I have been struck by how some of the candidates say things that contradict reality.

Jeff Johnson, a candidate for Minnesota Governor, writes that "I am pro-life" and that "My Christian faith guides every decision I make."

He goes on to say: "There is no more important issue than protecting innocent life. Not only is this a moral issue, recent breakthroughs in science and technology have made even more clear that we must protect the life of the unborn. I am Pro-Life and believe in the sanctity of human life from conception to natural death."

State Representative Jim Newberger is running against Senator Klobuchar. Like Jeff Johnson, Rep. Newbeger has made an issue of his support for Donald Trump's policies.

On his website Newburger writes: "I have worked hard to protect the unborn, and our constitutional rights, and our freedom from government intrusion and higher and higher taxes and fees and I will do it again in the US Senate."

I think the "innocent life" that Johnson is talking about is "the unborn" that Newberger refers to. Both of these men have been vocal supporters of Donald Trump's policy of separating immigrant and refugee children from their parents. I would think protecting innocent life would include protecting and nurturing children that are born. But, in Jeff Johnson's crazy world, the unborn are more deserving then the born.


    But it isn't just the innocent already born that the policies of Trump, Johnson, and Newberger are ravaging. Trump, and by their support, Johnson and Newberger have repealed the Obama era ban on jailing pregnant immigrant and refugee women. In addition, Trump has taken to shackling pregnant women by the hands, legs, and abdomen.

May those who claim to be Christians, and to be protectors of the unborn, burn in eternal hellfire for shackling pregnant women's abdomens.

A report by Buzzed News says that some women that have been shackled in this way have miscarried. The miscarriages have caused life threatening situations for some women, according to the Buzzed reporters. You can read the article below;

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/emaoconnor/pregnant-migrant-women-miscarriage-cpb-ice-detention-trump

The shackling of pregnant women is consistent with the barbarous disrespect that Trump and his allies show toward all women. Killing "the unborn" of immigrant and refugee women in the process shackling them is a new step down into the dark pit of depravity. Saying that "the unborn" are sacred,  and at the same time justifying immigration policies that kill them is psychotic.

Tim
Central Minnesota Political


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let us all walk in the foot steps of John Lewis

By John King In Selma, Alabama, on Sunday, March 7, 1965, John Lewis, standing in the lead of a long line of marchers, looked down from the crest of The Edmund Pettus Bridge at the line of police armed with clubs, whips and truncheons and said, “I am going to die here.” Lewis intended to lead the marchers from Selma to the capital Montgomery, to demand access to voting for Black people in Alabama. Sheriff Jim Clark lowered his gas mask and led the deputies, some on horseback and some on foot, into the line of marchers. Under swinging clubs and hooves trampling, Lewis was the first to go down. Women and children were not spared. Choking and blinded by tear gas, they were struck by clubs and truncheons wrapped with barbed wire. Lewis, with a fractured skull and a severe concussion, almost did die. The nearby Good Samaritan Hospital did not have enough beds to care for the injured marchers. A nation watched in horror as news footage of that bloody day appeared on T
2 comments
Read more

More Republican dirty tricks

  As a Blue Dog Corporate Democrat, 7th District Rep. Collin Peterson’s votes in Congress go against the beliefs and convictions of progressive voters in our district. I’m one of those progressive 7th District voters. Like most average voters I rarely actually encounter my Member of Congress. However, I recall three encounters with Rep. Peterson over the many years I’ve been stuck with him. I met him at Mikey’s Restaurant, on Main Street in Long Prairie, when he was first campaigning for a seat in Congress. We were both young then and he was full of energy and inspired in me a sense of hope for positive change. Besides, I’d met the Republican incumbent. He was an older man who, it seemed, was operating on dead batteries. I was happy to vote for the energetic Peterson. Some years later I was a delegate to the DFL District convention in Bemidji. Peterson opposed a woman’s right to choose abortion. He was being challenged by a woman who supported the right to that choice. I gave my
Post a Comment
Read more

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the
2 comments
Read more