Skip to main content

A voter suppressed

I ran this column in the Long Prairie Leader recently. After reading it a friend contacted me. She said her Mexican-American friends in Long Prairie had all been able to vote but all of them had been asked for their drivers licenses. She was not asked, she said. The dark skinned people were being treated differently then white skinned people, she said. She suggested that we have poll watchers at the next election. Good idea!

These Mexican-Americans had current and up-to-date voter registrations. The Long Prairie judges discriminated against the because the law says that if your registration is up to date you do not have to show you i.d. Here's the language from the Minnesota Secretary of State.


"If your voter registration is current and active, you do not need to bring identification. This means you were successfully registered at least 21 days before Election Day and you have not moved or changed names since then."


Tim 
Central Minnesota Political

A friend of mine thought the recent election was really important. So he made a plan to vote for the first time ever. His name is Francisco and, although he was born in Mexico, he’s been a U.S. citizen for years. He used to live in Melrose but he’s lived in Long Prairie for most of last year. When a family member called me and asked where Francisco could vote, I was happy to help. Long Prairie residents vote at City Hall, I said. Then we went over who was on the ballot. Since this year’s ballot was really complicated we got a copy of the sample ballot in the Long Prairie Leader for Francisco. He doesn’t speak or read much English but many of his family members do. They went over the ballot with him and he studied and thought about his choices.

On election day Francisco was ready to vote. He knew that Minnesota has same day voter registration. That is to say, eligible voters can register to vote on election day. Francisco knew what the rules for registration were. But to be safe, he brought along his adult English speaking granddaughter.

Here’s what the rules for same day registration would have been for Francisco. I say would have been because the Long Prairie election judges turned Francisco away. They wouldn’t let him vote.

So here are the rules. I’ve reviewed them with the Minnesota Secretary of State. I’ve reviewed them with the Todd County Auditor, who trains election judges in Todd County. And I’ve studied the rules at the Secretary of State’s website very carefully.

First of all, a person in Francisco’s situation has to have a bill with his Long Prairie address on it from the last thirty days. No problem. Francisco had that. He showed it to the election judges. That legally demonstrated that he was a Long Prairie resident.

Second, he had to have a picture i.d. card. Here’s what the Secretary of State’s website says about that. It says: “The ID can be expired.” The website also says that if the want-to-be voter uses a drivers license it can be a “Driver's license, state ID or learner’s permit issued by any state.”

The point is that the state of Minnesota wants an i.d. with the photo and the name of the want-to-be voter on the same i.d. card.

Francisco had a valid Minnesota drivers license with his name and photo on it. With the bill with his address on it and the photo i.d. he should have been able to register. But his drivers license had his old Melrose address on it. Francisco’s granddaughter explained that he was going to correct the address on the license when it expired in a couple of months. Nope! Can’t vote, said the wrong headed judges.

I’ve asked the Todd County Auditor and the Secretary of State: were those judges wrong to deny Francisco his chance to vote? Yes! They both said without hesitation.

So why did these election judges turn Francisco away? Would they have registered him if he’d had an i.d. from, for example, Colorado? Were they concerned that he’d vote in Long Prairie and then go and vote in Melrose? I don’t know. Whatever their reason, they denied him his rights guaranteed to all law abiding American citizens.

I asked a family member if Francisco would like to file a formal complaint. No, they said. He’s a quiet man who doesn’t like to cause trouble.

I don’t mind making a little trouble so I asked the Todd County Auditor about a complaint form. She said that there’s a form at the Secretary of State’s website. I spent a lot of time looking at that website and didn’t find it. So I called the Secretary of State’s office. A helpful fellow there agreed that the form was buried and he told me where to look. What he didn’t tell me was that there were two forms. One is called “HAVA ELECTIONS COMPLAINT FORM” and the other is called “MINNESOTA STATE ELECTION LAW COMPLAINT FORM”. To understand which form to fill out I’d need a lawyer.

Francisco may never try to vote again. I wouldn’t blame him.  But we need more Americans like Francisco to courageously step forward and cast their vote. We need to encourage him, and others like him, to vote. Our democracy depends on more of us voting. This year only 49% of registered voters in the U.S. showed up to vote. More then half of American registered to vote didn’t bother to show up. That, in my opinion, is a crisis for our democracy. So, what the dickens are we doing by discouraging people like Francisco from voting? 



Comments

  1. Debra Bell emailed me this question: What does it take to become an election judge? Are there any Mexican-American citizens interesting in becoming one?

    I wrote this back: You apply for the job through the County Auditor’s office. My guess is, like most people, Mexican-Americans don’t know how to become a judge. Perhaps the Auditor should publicize that.

    Tim
    Central Minnesota Political

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let us all walk in the foot steps of John Lewis

By John King In Selma, Alabama, on Sunday, March 7, 1965, John Lewis, standing in the lead of a long line of marchers, looked down from the crest of The Edmund Pettus Bridge at the line of police armed with clubs, whips and truncheons and said, “I am going to die here.” Lewis intended to lead the marchers from Selma to the capital Montgomery, to demand access to voting for Black people in Alabama. Sheriff Jim Clark lowered his gas mask and led the deputies, some on horseback and some on foot, into the line of marchers. Under swinging clubs and hooves trampling, Lewis was the first to go down. Women and children were not spared. Choking and blinded by tear gas, they were struck by clubs and truncheons wrapped with barbed wire. Lewis, with a fractured skull and a severe concussion, almost did die. The nearby Good Samaritan Hospital did not have enough beds to care for the injured marchers. A nation watched in horror as news footage of that bloody day appeared on T

More Republican dirty tricks

  As a Blue Dog Corporate Democrat, 7th District Rep. Collin Peterson’s votes in Congress go against the beliefs and convictions of progressive voters in our district. I’m one of those progressive 7th District voters. Like most average voters I rarely actually encounter my Member of Congress. However, I recall three encounters with Rep. Peterson over the many years I’ve been stuck with him. I met him at Mikey’s Restaurant, on Main Street in Long Prairie, when he was first campaigning for a seat in Congress. We were both young then and he was full of energy and inspired in me a sense of hope for positive change. Besides, I’d met the Republican incumbent. He was an older man who, it seemed, was operating on dead batteries. I was happy to vote for the energetic Peterson. Some years later I was a delegate to the DFL District convention in Bemidji. Peterson opposed a woman’s right to choose abortion. He was being challenged by a woman who supported the right to that choice. I gave my

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the