Skip to main content

Don't Nuke the Climate

Nuclear Power Violates Climate Justice, Human Rights

Environmental and Climate Justice Leaders Call Out Nuclear as False Solution 
Call On COP24 to Refuse Ambition-Killing Demands of Nuclear Promoters
Katowice, Poland – NEWS ADVISORY – Nuclear power makes climate change worse, and must not be promoted under the Paris global climate treaty, environmental and climate justice leaders with the Don’t Nuke the Climate Coalition said Wednesday, 12 December. COP24 has seen a marked escalation in the promotion of nuclear power by countries and corporate interests that are resisting urgent action on climate. Climate and environmental justice leaders from Africa, Asia, and North America called on climate negotiators to refuse calls for nuclear power and false solutions to climate change, which violate the climate justice and environmental integrity principles in the Paris Climate Treaty. Parties must focus instead on a rapid transition to a carbon-free, nuclear-free world, powered entirely by sustainable, renewable energy sources.

On Wednesday, 12 December, the coalition presented a petition opposing nuclear power as a false solution to climate change to German Environmental Minister, Svenja Schulze. The petition garnered over 3,500 signatures in just three days. Minister Schulze accepted the petition and signed it herself, and she stated that Germany would not allow any of the funds the country is contributing to the Green Climate Fund to be used for nuclear power. (Photos below.)
“The pursuit of nuclear power in South Africa would have permanently locked us into complicity in putting our country as a radioactive waste zone for centuries,” said Makoma Lekalakala, Director, Earthlife Africa Johnannesburg, and 2018 awardee of the Goldman Environmental Prize for Africa. “By challenging the secret $76 billion agreement between South Africa and Rosatom, we exposed the role of corruption at the highest level of our government. The agreement would have forced South Africans to pay all the costs of a nuclear disaster, contaminated our environment and water with radioactive waste, and made electricity unaffordable for generations,” continued Lekalakala. “We have all of the clean, affordable wind and solar energy we need in South Africa, and overturning the nuclear agreement has put us back on track for a healthy, sustainable future, free of fossil fuels.”
Unlike renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, nuclear power generation entails major, longlasting environmental impacts and damage to natural resources. The mining, processing, and enrichment of uranium for reactor fuel produces immense amounts of radioactive waste, and has an extensive track record of contaminating land, air, and drinking water–disproportionately affecting indigenous peoples and developing nations. The cooling systems of nuclear reactors place stress on drinking water sources and ecosystems, consuming more than a billion gallons of water per day, and discharging hot water and radioactive effluents. Reactors produce numerous streams of radioactive waste, including irradiated (“spent”) nuclear fuel, which is lethally radioactive for hundreds of years and environmentally hazardous for up to a million years. Indigenous nations and communities of color are most often targeted for radioactive waste dumps.
“Using nuclear power is a direct violation to our human rights and indigenous rights,” said Leona Morgan of Diné No Nukes, from the Navajo Nation. “From uranium mining to waste storage, the entire nuclear fuel chain causes death and destruction to our Mother Earth, to our plant and animal relatives, and ourselves as well as our future generations.”
The consequences of nuclear disasters such as Chernobyl and Fukushima are as overwhelming and long-lasting as the impacts of climate change. Due to rising sea levels, increasing frequency and severity of extreme weather events, and rising water temperatures, the potential for nuclear disasters is increasing along with other risks of climate change. Reducing the chances of compounding catastrophic events should be viewed as a climate adaptation measure.
“Nuclear power cannot be a solution for climate change. Japan experienced one of the severest nuclear catastrophe in history and it is still an ongoing crisis,” said Ayumi Fukakusa, Campaigner with Friends of the Earth-Japan. “Humans cannot afford any more nuclear disasters and fail to solve nuclear waste issues. People affected by Fukushima nuclear disaster are facing losses of livelihood and hometown, as well as poverty and isolation,” continued Fukakusa. “You can never be prepared for nuclear disaster and life after the evacuation is beyond imagination. We can never rely on such dangerous technology. The cost of nuclear power is enormous, and we have much better options to cope with climate crisis,” she concluded.
ABOUT the Don’t Nuke the Climate Coalition The Don’t Nuke the Climate Coalition is a network of anti-nuclear organisations and networks from all over the globe that work together to keep nuclear out of the climate agreements and implementation of the Paris treaty. www.dont-nuke-the-climate.org

Contact:        

Makoma Lekalakala, Earthlife Africa, +27 82 682 9177, makoma@earthlife.org.za
Ayumi Fukakusa, Friends of the Earth-Japan, fukakusa@foejapan.org
Leona Morgan, Diné No Nukes, +1 505 879 8547, leona.morgan.nm@gmail.com

Kerstin Rudek, Don’t Nuke the Climate      +49 1590 21 54 831, kerstin.rudek@gmx.de


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Let us all walk in the foot steps of John Lewis

By John King In Selma, Alabama, on Sunday, March 7, 1965, John Lewis, standing in the lead of a long line of marchers, looked down from the crest of The Edmund Pettus Bridge at the line of police armed with clubs, whips and truncheons and said, “I am going to die here.” Lewis intended to lead the marchers from Selma to the capital Montgomery, to demand access to voting for Black people in Alabama. Sheriff Jim Clark lowered his gas mask and led the deputies, some on horseback and some on foot, into the line of marchers. Under swinging clubs and hooves trampling, Lewis was the first to go down. Women and children were not spared. Choking and blinded by tear gas, they were struck by clubs and truncheons wrapped with barbed wire. Lewis, with a fractured skull and a severe concussion, almost did die. The nearby Good Samaritan Hospital did not have enough beds to care for the injured marchers. A nation watched in horror as news footage of that bloody day appeared on T

More Republican dirty tricks

  As a Blue Dog Corporate Democrat, 7th District Rep. Collin Peterson’s votes in Congress go against the beliefs and convictions of progressive voters in our district. I’m one of those progressive 7th District voters. Like most average voters I rarely actually encounter my Member of Congress. However, I recall three encounters with Rep. Peterson over the many years I’ve been stuck with him. I met him at Mikey’s Restaurant, on Main Street in Long Prairie, when he was first campaigning for a seat in Congress. We were both young then and he was full of energy and inspired in me a sense of hope for positive change. Besides, I’d met the Republican incumbent. He was an older man who, it seemed, was operating on dead batteries. I was happy to vote for the energetic Peterson. Some years later I was a delegate to the DFL District convention in Bemidji. Peterson opposed a woman’s right to choose abortion. He was being challenged by a woman who supported the right to that choice. I gave my

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the