Skip to main content

Minnesota coalition opposes constitution busting legislation

A bill, known as Worker Safety and Energy Security Act, is being considered by the Minnesota Senate and House. The Worker Safety and Energy Security Act, which is also known as HF 2241 or SF 2011, offers no protection to Minnesota workers. Instead, it proposes imposing draconian fines, and even prison time, on water protectors and environmental protestors. Although energy infrastructure such as power plants are included in the bills text, the authors dedicate much of their energy to oil and gas pipeline resistance. The bill exists because of the strong resistance to the Dakota Access pipeline and the anticipated protests if Line 3 construction starts next year.  
This week I had the honor of working with a group of people from MN350, the Sierra Club, The Land Stewardship Project, and the Minnesota chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union to develop a communications strategy to oppose this nasty piece of 1st Amendment busting legislation. 

It was very satisfying to see all of these organizations working together toward a common goal.  On our team we even had Kathy Hollander, who refers to herself as a volunteer lobbyist. I’d never heard of a volunteer lobbyist before but Kathy seemed knowledgeable, meticulous, and well connected to the political world at the Legislature. It’s good to have somebody like her on your team.

Kathy refers to this bill as the “Guilt by Association” bill. That is to say that if a pipeline protester is arrested for trespassing, for example, they will be arrested and fined but so will any group that they may have associated with that advocates against pipelines. The concern is that not only will protest be discouraged but that anti-pipeline advocacy will be discouraged for fear that advocacy groups will be held liable for unknown parties that choose to commit civil disobedience or inadvertently get in a tussle with the cops.

Here are some of the points of opposition to HF 2241/SF 2011 that were developed by the collaborative group:

*Minnesota has a long and proud history of people coming together to exercise their rights and make their voices heard. SF 2011/HF 2241 is designed to chill protest and assembly. The bill would compromise First Amendment rights with threat of excessive prison time and monetary liability. 

*SF 2011/HF 2241 is a strong-arm effort to squelch environmental activism and particularly meant to threaten Native groups that have built a powerful movement to protect their communities and spotlight environmental injustice.

*Minnesotans care about fairness under the law. It’s patently unfair to single out and threaten specific groups based on their beliefs and their commitment to protecting natural resources. That’s not One Minnesota.

One part of this bill that we did not talk about is that it proposes to deputize pipeline employees so that they can arrest protestors in the absence of the police. The bill also proposes holding harmless any of these deputized employees for damage or injury that they may cause.

In other words, the Minnesota Senate is proposing too deputize a squad of pipe line vigilantes who have free rein to interpret the law and then enforce it without being restricted by potential liability from injury or damage that they may cause. Not even police have those kinds of protections.

The Minnesota Coalition will be working to stop this legislation in the coming weeks. I hope that you will call your legislators  and tell them to oppose it.

Meanwhile Inside Climate News reports that legislators in fifteen states are attempting to pass, or have passed similar legislation. You can read their article here  https://tinyurl.com/y65k5ssl

“Environmental and civil liberties advocates, as well as many Native American tribes, say the bills are an attempt to stifle legitimate protest by creating harsh penalties for minor infractions and by trying to scare off advocacy groups. An organization that holds a nonviolence training, for example, might be targeted under the law if attendees are later part of a protest that ends in a clash with private security forces or police,” writes Nicholas Kusnetz, the author of the Inside Climate News article.

Tim

Central Minnesota Political 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let us all walk in the foot steps of John Lewis

By John King In Selma, Alabama, on Sunday, March 7, 1965, John Lewis, standing in the lead of a long line of marchers, looked down from the crest of The Edmund Pettus Bridge at the line of police armed with clubs, whips and truncheons and said, “I am going to die here.” Lewis intended to lead the marchers from Selma to the capital Montgomery, to demand access to voting for Black people in Alabama. Sheriff Jim Clark lowered his gas mask and led the deputies, some on horseback and some on foot, into the line of marchers. Under swinging clubs and hooves trampling, Lewis was the first to go down. Women and children were not spared. Choking and blinded by tear gas, they were struck by clubs and truncheons wrapped with barbed wire. Lewis, with a fractured skull and a severe concussion, almost did die. The nearby Good Samaritan Hospital did not have enough beds to care for the injured marchers. A nation watched in horror as news footage of that bloody day appeared on T

More Republican dirty tricks

  As a Blue Dog Corporate Democrat, 7th District Rep. Collin Peterson’s votes in Congress go against the beliefs and convictions of progressive voters in our district. I’m one of those progressive 7th District voters. Like most average voters I rarely actually encounter my Member of Congress. However, I recall three encounters with Rep. Peterson over the many years I’ve been stuck with him. I met him at Mikey’s Restaurant, on Main Street in Long Prairie, when he was first campaigning for a seat in Congress. We were both young then and he was full of energy and inspired in me a sense of hope for positive change. Besides, I’d met the Republican incumbent. He was an older man who, it seemed, was operating on dead batteries. I was happy to vote for the energetic Peterson. Some years later I was a delegate to the DFL District convention in Bemidji. Peterson opposed a woman’s right to choose abortion. He was being challenged by a woman who supported the right to that choice. I gave my

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the