Skip to main content

Trump charges Assange, escalates war on free speech

Earlier this month the Department of Justice charged Daniel Everette Hale with the crime of exposing the atrocities committed by Barak Obama and his murderous crew. Hale allegedly leaked Secret and Top Secret documents regarding Obama's use of drones to assassinate people to Jeremy Scahill, a reporter for The Intercept. 

 "From his first days as commander in chief, the drone has been President Barack Obama’s weapon of choice, used by the military and the CIA to hunt down and kill the people his administration has deemed — through secretive processes, without indictment or trial — worthy of execution. There has been intense focus on the technology of remote killing, but that often serves as a surrogate for what should be a broader examination of the state’s power over life and death," wrote Scahill. 

 You can read Scahill's 2014 reporting on Obama's  assassination program here https://theintercept.com/drone-papers/

 The premise of Scahill and his source was that this is the United States of America. We have a right to know what is being done in our name and with our tax dollars.

 That, of course was the premise of Edward Snowden, Reality Winner, Chelsea Manning, Daniel Ellsberg, and the other brave and idealistic young people who believed Americans had a right to know about the dark secrets in America's closet.
Julian Assange - thanks to Wikipedia
In addition to their courage these young people had something else in common. They were all news sources. They provided information to reporters for The New York Times, The Guardian, The Intercept and other news outlets. They didn't write or publish the story. By charging them with crimes against the state the government drew the line. They went after the sources but they didn't go after the publications or the reporters. In the rare instance that they did go after the publisher, they lost.

 With charging Julian Assange, of Wikileaks, with violations of that draconian Espionage Act, the Trump escalates its war on free speech and the media. Trump is now going after the publishers.

 If you've listened to National Public Radio dither about whether Wikileaks is a news source or not you may be confused. Let's be clear: Wikileaks is a news publisher the same as, for example, Buzz Feed News or BBC. I've used Wikileaks for news -- the same as I've used Vox or the Intercept for news. With Wikileaks charged other news sources, whether they be the Boston Globe or The Long Prairie Leader are at risk.

 I encourage you to listen to Jeremy Scahill make that very clear in this video https://theintercept.com/2019/05/21/why-you-should-care-about-donald-trumps-war-on-whistleblowers/

Nothing less then the Constitution is at stake.

Tim
Central Minnesota Political


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let us all walk in the foot steps of John Lewis

By John King In Selma, Alabama, on Sunday, March 7, 1965, John Lewis, standing in the lead of a long line of marchers, looked down from the crest of The Edmund Pettus Bridge at the line of police armed with clubs, whips and truncheons and said, “I am going to die here.” Lewis intended to lead the marchers from Selma to the capital Montgomery, to demand access to voting for Black people in Alabama. Sheriff Jim Clark lowered his gas mask and led the deputies, some on horseback and some on foot, into the line of marchers. Under swinging clubs and hooves trampling, Lewis was the first to go down. Women and children were not spared. Choking and blinded by tear gas, they were struck by clubs and truncheons wrapped with barbed wire. Lewis, with a fractured skull and a severe concussion, almost did die. The nearby Good Samaritan Hospital did not have enough beds to care for the injured marchers. A nation watched in horror as news footage of that bloody day appeared on T
2 comments
Read more

More Republican dirty tricks

  As a Blue Dog Corporate Democrat, 7th District Rep. Collin Peterson’s votes in Congress go against the beliefs and convictions of progressive voters in our district. I’m one of those progressive 7th District voters. Like most average voters I rarely actually encounter my Member of Congress. However, I recall three encounters with Rep. Peterson over the many years I’ve been stuck with him. I met him at Mikey’s Restaurant, on Main Street in Long Prairie, when he was first campaigning for a seat in Congress. We were both young then and he was full of energy and inspired in me a sense of hope for positive change. Besides, I’d met the Republican incumbent. He was an older man who, it seemed, was operating on dead batteries. I was happy to vote for the energetic Peterson. Some years later I was a delegate to the DFL District convention in Bemidji. Peterson opposed a woman’s right to choose abortion. He was being challenged by a woman who supported the right to that choice. I gave my
Post a Comment
Read more

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the
2 comments
Read more