Skip to main content

Sen. Gazelka and the failure of imagination

The column below was published in the Long Prairie Leader this week. We also handed a few copies of it out at the Todd County Fair booth last weekend.

While I was writing this New York State adapted a very strong 100% renewables goal (https://tinyurl.com/yyx49msp) as did Maine. At the same time The Sierra Club reports that well over 100 cities, towns, and counties have adapted 100% renewable energy plans and a number of communities have accomplished  their goals already (https://www.sierraclub.org/ready-for-100/commitments).

As I think about how much progress has been made in the face of the bull headed opposition of politicians such as Paul Gazelka and Donald Trump I am also thinking about my, and our, responsibility to be imaginative. Why could not band together a form a strong 100% renewable plan for our township, town, school district, or County. 

Indeed, we want to dis-elect Gazelka and Trump and their cronies but meanwhile we should get together and be imaginative.

Here's the Leader column.  

In 2007, only twelve years ago, Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty signed off on a visionary plan to put Minnesota on a path to a clean energy future. Pawlenty, working with the Minnesota Senate and House, signed legislation that mandated that all of Minnesota’s electrical utilities produce twenty-five percent of their electricity using renewable sources, such as wind and solar, by 2025. The Republican governor’s mandate, known as The Next Generation Energy Act, set the bar higher for Xcel Energy. Because they are allowed to operate the State’s only nuclear generators, their renewable standard was set at thirty percent.

Governor Pawlenty showed vision and he showed leadership and ninety-seven percent of Minnesota legislators agreed with him and signed The Next Generation Energy Act.

A lot of small minded people said it couldn’t be done. Generating that much electricity was too difficult, a minority of Minnesotans whined. Besides, government shouldn’t tell business what to do. Business should tell government officials what to do, they said, wringing their sweaty hands.

But Minnesotans were ready to follow the lead of their elected Governor and Legislature. We were ready for a challenge. We wanted big ideas. Over the next decade Minnesotans set to work installing wind generators and solar panels across the landscape. All that work required people with new skills and we created training centers and new employment opportunities. Pretty soon there were thousands of new jobs in the green energy economy and they paid really well. 

Tim Pawlenty’s mandate helped create a vibrant and growing new economy based on clean and renewable energy. And do you know what? Those visionary standards set by Minnesota’s leaders were a cake walk. We met them early and then we exceeded them. And the amount of renewable energy capacity in Minnesota just keeps increasing.

Because of Minnesota’s capacity to accept and meet a challenge, business and government  leaders set a new challenge for us earlier this year. 

Xcel Energy set a goal of getting 100 percent of its energy from carbon-free sources by 2050. Major corporations in the state, like 3M, have also committed to eliminate fossil fuels for electricity. Xcel has also committed to getting out of the nuclear power generating business by 2040.

While leaders in Minnesota’s corporate board rooms were making plans to usher in an era of clean, locally produced electricity, governmental leaders in St. Paul were crafting their own visionary to do list.

Early in the recent legislative session Minneapolis State Representative Jamie Long introduced legislation that would have mirrored Xcel’s plan. Representative Long’s legislation would have mandated all Minnesota utilities to produce 100% of their electricity from renewables by 2050.

Long’s legislation received deep and wide support following Governor Walz’ February announcement of support for 100% percent renewables.

“The governor's office said this proposal would strengthen existing law and allow for fossil fuel power only if required to ensure reliable, affordable electricity,” according to Minnesota Public Radio.

Walz and Long both recognize that electricity from renewables has become less expensive than dirty power from coal and even gas. They also recognize, like Governor Pawlenty before them, that Minnesotans love a good challenge and that we know how to profit from them.

Unfortunately Senator Paul Gazelka is not the visionary that Tim Pawlenty was. Gazelka told Public Television that he was against the Long - Walz 100% legislation. “We don’t want any new mandates,” Gazelka, who is the leader of the Minnesota Senate, said.

Gazelka didn’t explain why he was against a new mandate but history shows that certain mandates benefit all of us.  Children are mandated to attend school and we all benefit from their education. Drivers are mandated to drive at safe speeds and we all benefit. And, of course, Minnesota’s first renewable energy mandate benefited all of us with a stronger economy and cleaner air. 

So what, exactly, is Gazelka’s problem with this particular mandate?

Gazelka said that he had a technical problem with an electrical system based strictly on renewables. It’s not reliable, he said. Then he pointed to last winter’s extended cold spell to support his claim.

But he was wrong. The electrical system performed admirably during the cold spell. There was plenty of electricity. What nearly failed was the natural gas delivery system. You may recall that Xcel asked their gas customers to turn their thermometers down because they couldn’t keep up with supply.

But, just for fun, lets imagine that there are technical problems with having 100% of our electricity supplied by renewables. That’s today. Right!? Does Senator Gazelka not believe that we have the intelligence to solve that problem over the next thirty years? Why does Senator Gazelka have so little faith in Minnesotans? Why does he have so little imagination?

Tim
Central Minnesota Political


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Let us all walk in the foot steps of John Lewis

By John King In Selma, Alabama, on Sunday, March 7, 1965, John Lewis, standing in the lead of a long line of marchers, looked down from the crest of The Edmund Pettus Bridge at the line of police armed with clubs, whips and truncheons and said, “I am going to die here.” Lewis intended to lead the marchers from Selma to the capital Montgomery, to demand access to voting for Black people in Alabama. Sheriff Jim Clark lowered his gas mask and led the deputies, some on horseback and some on foot, into the line of marchers. Under swinging clubs and hooves trampling, Lewis was the first to go down. Women and children were not spared. Choking and blinded by tear gas, they were struck by clubs and truncheons wrapped with barbed wire. Lewis, with a fractured skull and a severe concussion, almost did die. The nearby Good Samaritan Hospital did not have enough beds to care for the injured marchers. A nation watched in horror as news footage of that bloody day appeared on T

More Republican dirty tricks

  As a Blue Dog Corporate Democrat, 7th District Rep. Collin Peterson’s votes in Congress go against the beliefs and convictions of progressive voters in our district. I’m one of those progressive 7th District voters. Like most average voters I rarely actually encounter my Member of Congress. However, I recall three encounters with Rep. Peterson over the many years I’ve been stuck with him. I met him at Mikey’s Restaurant, on Main Street in Long Prairie, when he was first campaigning for a seat in Congress. We were both young then and he was full of energy and inspired in me a sense of hope for positive change. Besides, I’d met the Republican incumbent. He was an older man who, it seemed, was operating on dead batteries. I was happy to vote for the energetic Peterson. Some years later I was a delegate to the DFL District convention in Bemidji. Peterson opposed a woman’s right to choose abortion. He was being challenged by a woman who supported the right to that choice. I gave my

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the