Skip to main content

December 6th climate strikers demand U of MN fossil fuel divestment



Climate activists across the globe and around the U.S. will be striking on Friday, December 6th. Here in the U.S. the strikers will be demanding that politicians seeking office in the 2020 elections publicly state their unqualified support of Green New Deal legislation if they want the electoral support of the climate strikers.
Thanks to Wikipedia
Here in Minnesota, the student led movement “Fossil Free Minnesota” is also demanding that the University of Minnesota divest its investment portfolio of fossil fuel companies. The organization, which has been campaigning since at least 2013, states as follows:

“Because it is unconscionable to pay for our education with investments that will condemn the planet to climate disaster, we call on the University of Minnesota to immediately freeze any new investment in fossil-fuel companies and to divest within five years from direct ownership and from any commingled funds that include fossil-fuel public equities and corporate bonds.“

The U of M has been tortoise-like in its response, but divestment from fossil fuel stocks by universities and colleges is not a radical action. In September, following a lengthy campaign by students and faculty, the University of California announced it will divest its $83 billion in endowment and pension funds from the fossil fuel industry. The move by the governing officials of the vast university came just before September’s global climate strike.

“This is the biggest single commitment by any educational institution in the world and it represents a true watershed,” said Bill McKibben, author and founder of the environmental group 350.org the on-line magazine Cal Matters.

Like the climate strike, the movement to divest is global. An April 2018 article in the British magazine DeSmogUK noted that the United Kingdom had emerged as the world leader in university divestments, with over eighty-billion pounds in divestments at that time.

“I’m very proud of the University’s decision. Climate change is one of the world’s biggest challenges. Over the past few years, we have thought hard about how to respond to that challenge. This change in our investment strategy is a vital step on that journey,” Professor Charlie Jeffery, Senior Vice-Principal of the University of Edinburgh, told DeSmogUK.

Numerous other colleges and universities in the United Kingdom have divested from fossil fuel investments. But their decisions haven’t been entirely based on a desire to preserve a hospitable climate. University administrators have also been interested in protecting their investments and, it seems, fossil fuel investments are bad business these days.

“We believe hanging onto fossil fuel assets is a financial risk,” chief investment officer Jagdeep Singh Bachher and Richard Sherman, chair of the University of California’s regents’ investment committee, wrote in the Los Angeles Times last September.

Fossil Free Minnesota says that the University of Minnesota has a moral and ethical responsibility to divest from fossil fuel investments. Based on the falling value of fossil fuel investments, they also have a financial obligation to all Minnesotans to divest from those investments.

It’s time for the U of M to listen to Fossil Free Minnesota and to divest from fossil fuel investments. Others have led the way. Now is the time for the U of M to follow their lead.

Tim

Central Minnesota Political

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Let us all walk in the foot steps of John Lewis

By John King In Selma, Alabama, on Sunday, March 7, 1965, John Lewis, standing in the lead of a long line of marchers, looked down from the crest of The Edmund Pettus Bridge at the line of police armed with clubs, whips and truncheons and said, “I am going to die here.” Lewis intended to lead the marchers from Selma to the capital Montgomery, to demand access to voting for Black people in Alabama. Sheriff Jim Clark lowered his gas mask and led the deputies, some on horseback and some on foot, into the line of marchers. Under swinging clubs and hooves trampling, Lewis was the first to go down. Women and children were not spared. Choking and blinded by tear gas, they were struck by clubs and truncheons wrapped with barbed wire. Lewis, with a fractured skull and a severe concussion, almost did die. The nearby Good Samaritan Hospital did not have enough beds to care for the injured marchers. A nation watched in horror as news footage of that bloody day appeared on T
2 comments
Read more

More Republican dirty tricks

  As a Blue Dog Corporate Democrat, 7th District Rep. Collin Peterson’s votes in Congress go against the beliefs and convictions of progressive voters in our district. I’m one of those progressive 7th District voters. Like most average voters I rarely actually encounter my Member of Congress. However, I recall three encounters with Rep. Peterson over the many years I’ve been stuck with him. I met him at Mikey’s Restaurant, on Main Street in Long Prairie, when he was first campaigning for a seat in Congress. We were both young then and he was full of energy and inspired in me a sense of hope for positive change. Besides, I’d met the Republican incumbent. He was an older man who, it seemed, was operating on dead batteries. I was happy to vote for the energetic Peterson. Some years later I was a delegate to the DFL District convention in Bemidji. Peterson opposed a woman’s right to choose abortion. He was being challenged by a woman who supported the right to that choice. I gave my
Post a Comment
Read more

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the
2 comments
Read more