Skip to main content

December 6th climate strikers demand U of MN fossil fuel divestment



Climate activists across the globe and around the U.S. will be striking on Friday, December 6th. Here in the U.S. the strikers will be demanding that politicians seeking office in the 2020 elections publicly state their unqualified support of Green New Deal legislation if they want the electoral support of the climate strikers.
Thanks to Wikipedia
Here in Minnesota, the student led movement “Fossil Free Minnesota” is also demanding that the University of Minnesota divest its investment portfolio of fossil fuel companies. The organization, which has been campaigning since at least 2013, states as follows:

“Because it is unconscionable to pay for our education with investments that will condemn the planet to climate disaster, we call on the University of Minnesota to immediately freeze any new investment in fossil-fuel companies and to divest within five years from direct ownership and from any commingled funds that include fossil-fuel public equities and corporate bonds.“

The U of M has been tortoise-like in its response, but divestment from fossil fuel stocks by universities and colleges is not a radical action. In September, following a lengthy campaign by students and faculty, the University of California announced it will divest its $83 billion in endowment and pension funds from the fossil fuel industry. The move by the governing officials of the vast university came just before September’s global climate strike.

“This is the biggest single commitment by any educational institution in the world and it represents a true watershed,” said Bill McKibben, author and founder of the environmental group 350.org the on-line magazine Cal Matters.

Like the climate strike, the movement to divest is global. An April 2018 article in the British magazine DeSmogUK noted that the United Kingdom had emerged as the world leader in university divestments, with over eighty-billion pounds in divestments at that time.

“I’m very proud of the University’s decision. Climate change is one of the world’s biggest challenges. Over the past few years, we have thought hard about how to respond to that challenge. This change in our investment strategy is a vital step on that journey,” Professor Charlie Jeffery, Senior Vice-Principal of the University of Edinburgh, told DeSmogUK.

Numerous other colleges and universities in the United Kingdom have divested from fossil fuel investments. But their decisions haven’t been entirely based on a desire to preserve a hospitable climate. University administrators have also been interested in protecting their investments and, it seems, fossil fuel investments are bad business these days.

“We believe hanging onto fossil fuel assets is a financial risk,” chief investment officer Jagdeep Singh Bachher and Richard Sherman, chair of the University of California’s regents’ investment committee, wrote in the Los Angeles Times last September.

Fossil Free Minnesota says that the University of Minnesota has a moral and ethical responsibility to divest from fossil fuel investments. Based on the falling value of fossil fuel investments, they also have a financial obligation to all Minnesotans to divest from those investments.

It’s time for the U of M to listen to Fossil Free Minnesota and to divest from fossil fuel investments. Others have led the way. Now is the time for the U of M to follow their lead.

Tim

Central Minnesota Political

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Senator Gazelka: Prepare for End Times

Review by John King “Marketplace Ministers are part of how the Lord will reach the peoples of the earth in these last days.” Author Paul Gazelka wrote this astonishing sentence near the conclusion of his 2003 book, Marketplace Ministers , but it is a good place to start here because it so neatly encapsulates the message of the book which is that business people, by spreading the Gospel, are in a unique position to prepare us, for the end of the world.   Gazelka, an insurance salesman in Baxter, Minnesota, devotes chapters one through four to the story of his religious calling and how he came to adopt the “marketplace” as his personal ministry.  He goes to some length, relying in part on the “Fivefold Path” from Ephesians to convince the reader that the marketplace is a legitimate pulpit to spread the Word.  The remainder of the book, using personal anecdotes and biblical passages, he explains how a marketplace ministry would function and what its usefulness w...
3 comments
Read more

Super-emitting frequent fliers responsible for 50% of aviation CO2

U.S. airlines received a $15 billion subsidy in December’s COVID relief package. The subsidy was for the companies to re-employ thousands of their furloughed employees and keep them on the payroll until at least the end of the first quarter of this year. Congress, and the President, attached no other strings to the huge subsidy, even though airlines social costs, in terms of climate disruption, are huge. In 2018 airlines produced a billion tons of CO2 and benefited from a $100 billion subsidy by not paying for the climate damage they caused, a report published in the November 2020 journal Global Environmental Change, pointed out. The report, summarized in The Guardian on November 17th, drew together data to provide a global picture of the impact of frequent fliers. The conclusion reached by the study’s authors, led by Stefan Gössling at Linnaeus University in Sweden, is that a tiny fraction of the global population benefits from the highly subsidized airline industry while the rest...
4 comments
Read more

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the...
2 comments
Read more