Skip to main content

Who will pay: A Climate Change Story


Who will pay: A Climate Change Story

by Tim King

The vast Chukchi Sea, between the Bering Strait and the Arctic Ocean, has been the friend and partner of the Inupiaq people for millennia. It was the source of their life and their culture. But, for the Inupiaq that fished and hunted in the area of the Kivalina and Wulik rivers, that began to come to an end at the beginning of the last century.

‘Kivalina is a small Unupiaq village in Northwest Arctic Alaska that sits on a barrier reef  island,” Colleen Swan, the Kivalina Tribal Administrator, told Christine Shearer for her 2011 book Kivalina: A Climate Change Story. “The village sits there because, in 1905, the Bureau of Indian Affairs came and built a school on the island, informing the people who lived in the geographic area that they had to bring their children to the school to be educated or face imprisonment. Historically the island had only been used for seasonal hunting and fishing. The Inupiaq people complied and brought their children to the school from their individual settlements on the outskirts of the barrier island, an area that was and is their aboriginal territory.”

“Over time, life became difficult and the parents were concerned that they were endangering the lives of their children by bringing them to and from the school during winter storms and subzero temperatures. Winter consists of approximately nine months out of the year in this part of the world. The parents began moving their families to the island permanently and that began a different life for them in what is now a village called Kivalina,” Swan continued.  

The people did not need that education that the colonists forced on them and the the island they were forced to  move to was doomed.

The process likely started earlier, but Christine Shearer says that Kivalina elders first recall noticing sea erosion on the island in the 1950s. The island, which is made of sand and gravel, was being eroded from wave action and storm surges from the Chukchi’s powerful winter storms. The storms were eroding the island because year-by-year, with increasing rapidity, the Sea was warming and not forming the dense mat of protective ice before the storms began.

Shearer describes a series of storms in the first decade of this century that relentlessly chewed away the ground under the little community. An excerpted description included in her book by written by David Darlington, of the Readers Digest, is perhaps the most graphic.

“As the first big fall storm approached in 2004, the ground behind [the school principal’s] trailer collapsed. Where there had once been a broad beach between the town and the ocean, the earth behind the buildings now dropped directly into the water, and the former school principal Gerry Pickner suddenly found his house teetering on a steep bank with seawater splashing against its windows. While teachers scrambled to move his belongings into the school, the ocean advanced on the town’s fuel tank and generators; meanwhile, at the island’s north end, waves threatened a gravel airstrip, Kivalina’s main connection with the outside world,” Darlington wrote.

Kivalina was hammered by powerful storms again in 2005 and again in 2007. In 2008 the people had had enough. They sued a raft of fossil fuel companies, including Exxon Mobil, for the estimated  cost to relocate the village from the fast disappearing island to a higher site on the mainland. The US Army Corps of Engineers had estimated the cost to relocate to be between $100 and $400 million and the science was clear: The fossil fuel industry was largely responsible for the disappearing ice in the Chukchi Sea and, as a consequence, the disappearing island of Kivalina. The village also sued the fossil fuel companies for creating a false debate around global warming.

The Inupiaq people believed that they were owed recompense from the fossil fuel companies who knowingly corrupted the truth about the destructive use of fossil fuels and thereby were responsible for the destruction of their home and way of life. 

Kivalina from the air - Wikipedia


Kivalina: A Climate Change Story is not about the law suit, which was dismissed by a federal judge in 2009. It is about the tragedy experienced by the people of Kivalina. It is also about a more than fifty year campaign to knowingly corrupt American public discourse, politics, and the judiciary so that those who are responsible for the tragedy at Kivalina, and other corporate wrong doing, will not be held to account.

Minnesota recently sued ExxonMobil, and oters, for creating a false debate around global warming. If you want to understand what Minnesota’s lawsuit is up against Kivalina: A Climate Change Story is an excellent explainer.

Kivalina  A Climate Change Story, 2011; by Christine Shearer

Tim
Central Minnesota Political


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Let us all walk in the foot steps of John Lewis

By John King In Selma, Alabama, on Sunday, March 7, 1965, John Lewis, standing in the lead of a long line of marchers, looked down from the crest of The Edmund Pettus Bridge at the line of police armed with clubs, whips and truncheons and said, “I am going to die here.” Lewis intended to lead the marchers from Selma to the capital Montgomery, to demand access to voting for Black people in Alabama. Sheriff Jim Clark lowered his gas mask and led the deputies, some on horseback and some on foot, into the line of marchers. Under swinging clubs and hooves trampling, Lewis was the first to go down. Women and children were not spared. Choking and blinded by tear gas, they were struck by clubs and truncheons wrapped with barbed wire. Lewis, with a fractured skull and a severe concussion, almost did die. The nearby Good Samaritan Hospital did not have enough beds to care for the injured marchers. A nation watched in horror as news footage of that bloody day appeared on T

More Republican dirty tricks

  As a Blue Dog Corporate Democrat, 7th District Rep. Collin Peterson’s votes in Congress go against the beliefs and convictions of progressive voters in our district. I’m one of those progressive 7th District voters. Like most average voters I rarely actually encounter my Member of Congress. However, I recall three encounters with Rep. Peterson over the many years I’ve been stuck with him. I met him at Mikey’s Restaurant, on Main Street in Long Prairie, when he was first campaigning for a seat in Congress. We were both young then and he was full of energy and inspired in me a sense of hope for positive change. Besides, I’d met the Republican incumbent. He was an older man who, it seemed, was operating on dead batteries. I was happy to vote for the energetic Peterson. Some years later I was a delegate to the DFL District convention in Bemidji. Peterson opposed a woman’s right to choose abortion. He was being challenged by a woman who supported the right to that choice. I gave my

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the