Skip to main content

Eat meat, sequester carbon

Properly managed regenerative grazing of beef cattle can result in more carbon stored in the soil than the cattle release into the environment, according to a Life Cycle Assessment Commissioned by General Mills and conducted by researchers at Quantis International. The study was conducted in 2017 at White Oaks Pastures in Bluffton Georgia. White Oak Pastures regeneratively grazes cattle, sheep, and poultry on three thousand acres of land in southwest Georgia. They call their methods radical traditional farming. 

The  White Oak study points out that conventionally raised beef justifiably has a bad reputation because of its large carbon footprint. However, the net carbon dioxide emissions at White Oak was a negative 3.5 kilograms of carbon dioxide per kilogram of fresh meat produced. This compares to thirty-three kilograms of carbon dioxide emitted per kilogram of meat produced in conventional U.S. beef production.

White Oak Pasture’s grazing system, which integrates cattle with hogs, sheep, and poultry, is six times more carbon efficient than conventional beef systems and actually reduces overall carbon emissions, according to the Life Cycle Assessment conducted by the reports authors.

The Quantis Life Cycle Assessment took into consideration carbon emissions from the cattles digestion (known as enteric emissions), manure, and the transport and slaughter of the cattle as well is miscellaneous farm activities. Enteric and manure emissions contributed thirty-four kilograms of carbon dioxide per kilogram of meat produced and were by far the biggest carbon culprits. However, soil carbon sequestration and carbon sequestration in vegetative matter offset that by a total of minus thirty-nine kilograms of carbon dioxide per kilogram of meat produced. The majority of the carbon offset was in highly stable soil carbon.

The results of this study suggest that protein produced by ruminants using the regenerative grazing system employed by White Oak Pastures will have a zero to negative green house gas foot print while conventional beef, sheep, pork, poultry and even soy all have a positive green house gas foot print.

The Quantis study considers that it may be underemphasizing the role of methane in enteric emissions. It also points out that if the pastures at White Oak are tilled in the next decade the benefits of sequestering soil carbon will be largely lost. They also point out that their study may be conservative because the science to measure enteric emissions needs to be refined. If that is the case, the carbon offset could increase. The authors believe that the carbon offset may also increase as the land at White Oak Pastures continues to regenerate.

Agriculture makes up nine percent of America’s green house gas emissions, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, and livestock accounts for about one-third of that. If livestock producers adapted the model of regenerative grazing used by White Oak Pastures the green house gas offset could have a very positive effect on agricultures role in global climate disruption.




Tim

Central Minnesota Political

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Senator Gazelka: Prepare for End Times

Review by John King “Marketplace Ministers are part of how the Lord will reach the peoples of the earth in these last days.” Author Paul Gazelka wrote this astonishing sentence near the conclusion of his 2003 book, Marketplace Ministers , but it is a good place to start here because it so neatly encapsulates the message of the book which is that business people, by spreading the Gospel, are in a unique position to prepare us, for the end of the world.   Gazelka, an insurance salesman in Baxter, Minnesota, devotes chapters one through four to the story of his religious calling and how he came to adopt the “marketplace” as his personal ministry.  He goes to some length, relying in part on the “Fivefold Path” from Ephesians to convince the reader that the marketplace is a legitimate pulpit to spread the Word.  The remainder of the book, using personal anecdotes and biblical passages, he explains how a marketplace ministry would function and what its usefulness w...
3 comments
Read more

Super-emitting frequent fliers responsible for 50% of aviation CO2

U.S. airlines received a $15 billion subsidy in December’s COVID relief package. The subsidy was for the companies to re-employ thousands of their furloughed employees and keep them on the payroll until at least the end of the first quarter of this year. Congress, and the President, attached no other strings to the huge subsidy, even though airlines social costs, in terms of climate disruption, are huge. In 2018 airlines produced a billion tons of CO2 and benefited from a $100 billion subsidy by not paying for the climate damage they caused, a report published in the November 2020 journal Global Environmental Change, pointed out. The report, summarized in The Guardian on November 17th, drew together data to provide a global picture of the impact of frequent fliers. The conclusion reached by the study’s authors, led by Stefan Gössling at Linnaeus University in Sweden, is that a tiny fraction of the global population benefits from the highly subsidized airline industry while the rest...
4 comments
Read more

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the...
2 comments
Read more