Skip to main content

MN Chamber of Commerce captured by Koch Industries

Minnesota’s premier business association, the 2,300 member Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, spends nearly two and a half million dollars annually, to lobby Minnesota Legislators and decision makers, according to The Power Behind Climate Denial in Minnesota, a report issued recently by MN350 and other Minnesota environmental organizations. Much of that money, which comes from its large and small members aross Minnesota, is directed toward fostering climate science denial and opposing even modest, and previously bipartisan, proposals to protect the climate and the environment. For example, in 2020 more than twenty-five groups representing utilities, energy companies, unions, major corporations, scientists, and environmental activists testified in the Minnesota House of Representatives in favor of the ECO Act. Only lobbyists for the Chamber of Commere and the Minnesota Propane Association opposed it. The irony of the testimony from the Chamber of Commerce lobbyists was that it was in opposition to it paying members who testified for the legislation. The ECO Act sought to reward residential energy customers who switched to more efficient heating systems that relied on electricity rather than propane. The Act, which was introduced by Republican Senator Jason Rarick, from Pine City, would have created jobs for local contractors, released utility companies from minimum spending requirements, prioritized benefits for low income home owners, and expanded consumer choice by rewarding them for switching to more efficient heating systems, according to MN350’s report. The Propane Association’s opposition to the legislation is easy to understand. They want people to use more propane. The reasoning behind the opposition of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce is less transparent. However, MN350’s report makes a strong case for the claim that one Chamber member, the Pine Bend Refinery own by Koch Industries, has essentially captured the Chamber of Commerce when it comes to policy regarding bills such as the ECO Act, or other legislation regarding energy efficiency and the reduction of fossil fuel use. This is the case, the report argues, even though many of the other large members of the Chamber have expressly stated their support for increased energy efficiency, reduced petroleum use, and a greener economy. The report points out that Koch Industries lobbyist, Matthew Lemke, is on the Board of Directors for the Minnesota Chamber of Commere and that time-and-again Chamber lobbyists statements have mirrored the Koch-Pine Bend position rather than that of companies such as 3M or Target. The report gives another example, in addition to the ECO Act. “Clean Energy First required Minnesota’s utilities to prioritize clean energy when making new investments,” the report’s authors write. “The bill passed the House in 2019 but when Chamber lobbyist Lauryn Schothorst spoke in opposition to the Senate version, introduced by Republican Senator David Senjum, the bill ended up allowing dirty fuels to be called clean fuels.” Allowing dirty fuels to be called clean fuels aligns with Pine Bend Refinery’s position but is in opposition to the stated and written policies of many other hamber of Commerce members. And again, In 2019, the Chamber opposed a renewed Renewable Energy Standard which was originally supported by 97% of the Legislature as well as Republican Governor Tim Pawlenty, in 2007. The Chambers repeated falling into line with the fossil fuel industry flies in the face of the stated goal of many of its members. Target, for example, states on its web site that: “Target acknowledges the scientific consensus that the climate is changing, that our business is contributing to that change, and that our supply chain, operations, and customers will continue to be impacted by the effects of climate change. We are committed to reducing our greenhouse gas (GHG) footprint, and to engaging constructively with industry peers, value chain partners, external stakeholders, and policymakers to help accelerate the transition to a low-carbon economy. Target also supports the Paris Agreement and national, regional, and local policy solutions to reduce emissions and build resilience to climate change.” Sounds good! But there is no evidence, however, that Target, or any other member of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce has “engaged with its industry peers” to challenge the Chamber to support “regional, and local policy solutions to reduce emissions and build resilience to climate change.” The Power Behind Climate Denial in Minnesota is a call to Target, and other Chamber of Commerce member, to prove their claims about reducing GHG emissions aren’t mere greenwashing. They, and their business association, must be held acountable for their climate claims in the upcoming legislative session. If you know a member of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce, or if you work for a member, please urge them to support climate friendly policies and and legislation. The MN350 report can be found at https://mn350action.org/badforbusiness/report/ Tim Minnesota Political

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Let us all walk in the foot steps of John Lewis

By John King In Selma, Alabama, on Sunday, March 7, 1965, John Lewis, standing in the lead of a long line of marchers, looked down from the crest of The Edmund Pettus Bridge at the line of police armed with clubs, whips and truncheons and said, “I am going to die here.” Lewis intended to lead the marchers from Selma to the capital Montgomery, to demand access to voting for Black people in Alabama. Sheriff Jim Clark lowered his gas mask and led the deputies, some on horseback and some on foot, into the line of marchers. Under swinging clubs and hooves trampling, Lewis was the first to go down. Women and children were not spared. Choking and blinded by tear gas, they were struck by clubs and truncheons wrapped with barbed wire. Lewis, with a fractured skull and a severe concussion, almost did die. The nearby Good Samaritan Hospital did not have enough beds to care for the injured marchers. A nation watched in horror as news footage of that bloody day appeared on T

More Republican dirty tricks

  As a Blue Dog Corporate Democrat, 7th District Rep. Collin Peterson’s votes in Congress go against the beliefs and convictions of progressive voters in our district. I’m one of those progressive 7th District voters. Like most average voters I rarely actually encounter my Member of Congress. However, I recall three encounters with Rep. Peterson over the many years I’ve been stuck with him. I met him at Mikey’s Restaurant, on Main Street in Long Prairie, when he was first campaigning for a seat in Congress. We were both young then and he was full of energy and inspired in me a sense of hope for positive change. Besides, I’d met the Republican incumbent. He was an older man who, it seemed, was operating on dead batteries. I was happy to vote for the energetic Peterson. Some years later I was a delegate to the DFL District convention in Bemidji. Peterson opposed a woman’s right to choose abortion. He was being challenged by a woman who supported the right to that choice. I gave my

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the