Skip to main content

Let us all walk in the foot steps of John Lewis

By John King In Selma, Alabama, on Sunday, March 7, 1965, John Lewis, standing in the lead of a long line of marchers, looked down from the crest of The Edmund Pettus Bridge at the line of police armed with clubs, whips and truncheons and said, “I am going to die here.” Lewis intended to lead the marchers from Selma to the capital Montgomery, to demand access to voting for Black people in Alabama. Sheriff Jim Clark lowered his gas mask and led the deputies, some on horseback and some on foot, into the line of marchers. Under swinging clubs and hooves trampling, Lewis was the first to go down. Women and children were not spared. Choking and blinded by tear gas, they were struck by clubs and truncheons wrapped with barbed wire.
Lewis, with a fractured skull and a severe concussion, almost did die. The nearby Good Samaritan Hospital did not have enough beds to care for the injured marchers. A nation watched in horror as news footage of that bloody day appeared on TV and in the papers. Congress was galvanized to act, especially President Lyndon Johnson, and by September the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was passed and signed. The Voting Rights Act singled out a handful of states, mostly in the south, that had a dark history of denying African Americans the right to vote. Terrorism, lynching and a system of restrictive voting laws in the Jim Crow south prevented African Americans voting so only a fraction of eligible voters actually registered and voted. The Act was a phenomenal success. It required these states to seek prior approval before making changes to their voting laws. The federal government would shortstop any discriminatory or restrictive voting laws. As a result, African American voter registration soared to rival white voter registration, and some cities and states elected African American leaders. But this law proved too burdensome for the white majority. The courts, in 2013, concluded that the Jim Crow South, with its infamous voter suppression tactics, was dead and gone and federal oversight of state election laws was no longer needed. So key provisions of the law were struck down and states became free to make their own laws without federal supervision. Sadly, the courts were overly optimistic in their thinking that voter suppression was a thing of the past. If they were to revisit their decision in 2021, it's likely they would change their mind. Hardly was the ink dry on the 2013 decision when states rushed, like chickens on a June bug, to change their voting laws. North Carolina wasted no time in passing HB 589, a bill which put in a strict photo I.D. requirement, eliminated same-day voting registration, and shortened the early voting period, among other restrictive policies. One policy in particular banned early voting on Sundays, which North Carolina admitted in court was because counties that offered it were likely to have higher black populations. Within 24 hours of the 2013 court decision Texas had a strict photo ID law on the books. A strict voter ID law in Alabama cut off 180,000 voters with a disproportionate number being African Ameicans. The bills, in the way they are crafted, target the shortcomings in the American voting system. Unlike other countries, there is no national voting holiday. And there is no automatic registration. As a consequence, people must take time off, or perhaps stand in line for long periods during peak voting times. Low wage workers without this kind of time, thus become a target for these bills. Many people, including the elderly and people living in poverty, have no transportation, so closing some polling places becomes a suppression tactic. These suppression bills are like a virus exploiting preexisting conditions. Many reservations have no street addresses so crafting a voter ID bill that requires a street address disenfranchises Native Americans. Eliminating early voting, mail in voting and, as some of the bills do, eliminating Sundays from early voting, makes it harder for the working poor to vote. Eliminate both mail in voting and early voting and long lines will form at the polling places. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is gutted and John Lewis died of cancer in August. But his name and his legacy will live on in the passage of the John Lewis Voting Rights Act of 2021. This bill, known as HR1 in the House, will establish uniform standards for voting access and increase voter participation. It will take the partisan politics out of congressional redistricting and will reform campaign finance. It is an ambitious bill with many other provisions, some of them open to legitimate debate. But it is a much needed piece of legislation that will allow America to live up to its promise of Democracy for all. John King Long Prairie

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More Republican dirty tricks

  As a Blue Dog Corporate Democrat, 7th District Rep. Collin Peterson’s votes in Congress go against the beliefs and convictions of progressive voters in our district. I’m one of those progressive 7th District voters. Like most average voters I rarely actually encounter my Member of Congress. However, I recall three encounters with Rep. Peterson over the many years I’ve been stuck with him. I met him at Mikey’s Restaurant, on Main Street in Long Prairie, when he was first campaigning for a seat in Congress. We were both young then and he was full of energy and inspired in me a sense of hope for positive change. Besides, I’d met the Republican incumbent. He was an older man who, it seemed, was operating on dead batteries. I was happy to vote for the energetic Peterson. Some years later I was a delegate to the DFL District convention in Bemidji. Peterson opposed a woman’s right to choose abortion. He was being challenged by a woman who supported the right to that choice. I gave my

Step aside Republicans; Minnesotans want electric vehicles

Late last month Senator Paul Gazelka, the Republican leader of the Senate, told the Minnesota Reformer that the Republican controlled Senate would likely fire the acting Commissioner of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Laura Bishop, if the Agency, at the behest of the Governor, went ahead with the Clean Car Rule. The rule would require automakers to increase the number of electric vehicles they deliver to Minnesota auto dealers. Gazelka told The Reformer that he’d had “a conversation” with Bishop about the rule. Bishop has not been confirmed by the Senate. Gazelka, and his Republican colleagues, claim that electric vehicles are too expensive and that the rule would be a burden to Minnesotans. Gazelka, and the rest of his Party are wrong. They aren’t paying attention to the economics of EV ownership and they are not paying attention to consumer preferences. Way back in September 2019, Consumer Reports reported on a study of Minnesotans they had done in collaboration with the